Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
Organization's members of different age work at place for achieving company's goals by using knowledge and skills which they acquired throughout the graduation age. While people believe that increase in employee's age decrease the employee's efficiency, others argue that efficiency and durability have no role with age. This essay will discuss both views after analyzing this argument and explore the logical conclusion.
Firstly, employees work in organization have skills and knowledge of their domain. People believe that employee works with dedication and get rewards by putting all efforts to achieve the goal. Company has no rights to oust them from employment until there is disability factors. For instance, person's age increases while working and fulfill all assigned jobs assigned to him but age increases doesn't mean that he is not viable to finish his job. Even though they become more revere experienced person and discrimination against older workers should not be legal.
Secondly, people argue increases in age of employees put the company's revenue on risk has right view as per their nation. They believe that employees do not work with full concentration once they find themselves very secure with longevity. Eventually, employees provide less output of their assigned work. Giving this opportunity to enthusiastic person can provide better performance. People argue that discrimination with respect to age of employee by removing or less promotions should be legal.
In recapitulate, while this essay discussed both views of this argument. In my personal opinion, discrimination against older workers should be made illegal. I recommend that older workers are like pearl who just glow and provide light to other employees in terms of knowledge and skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... increase in employees age decrease the employees efficiency, others argue that efficienc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and explore the logical conclusion. Firstly, employees work in organization ...
^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... jobs assigned to him but age increases doesnt mean that he is not viable to finish hi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inst older workers should not be legal. Secondly, people argue increases in age ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun promotions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...spect to age of employee by removing or less promotions should be legal. In recap...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng or less promotions should be legal. In recapitulate, while this essay discus...
^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ssed both views of this argument. In my personal opinion, discrimination against older workers s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47810218978 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79073967418 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602189781022 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5920102927 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8125 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172007535514 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636747475997 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829063613514 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115225026434 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124664233034 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.