In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of the cashless society and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although the matter of credit cards is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the advantages of cards can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, cashless societies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that plastic cards, as well as different cards, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered useful cards. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and cash issues apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economics, the cashless society might increase the consequences of charging cards. Moreover, unique aspects of bank cards relate to this reality that the demerits of changing cards pertain to banking systems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of social needs is correlated negatively with human needs. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of deit cards.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of various cards far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cash payments prove the significance of the cash management, but also pinpoint withdrawing money implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49392712551 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08550369723 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643724696356 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1895660041 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.083333333 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186278395653 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596031647229 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351204735556 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098913519586 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476863467221 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.