Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts.
Nowadays, communication channels have become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question what are the positive and negative consequences?. It is a widely held view that modern communicating devices are highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must carefully weigh up the pros and cons.
From a social point of view, making a connection is indeed abound to making a friendship relation, which it might lead to both social and personal advantages. For instance, a group of reputable psychologists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between being alone and suicide as well as psychologies issues. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that having an easiest communicating to other people is positively correlated with not only better society but also healthiest people from psychological aspects.
Moreover, in technological terms, modern communication channels are undoubtedly attributable to high-tech devices, in that it would lead to cheaper, easier and reachable communicating. A well-known example such of attribution is the Internet, which is the cause of concern since it had been mistaken in taking the safety of the internet for granted. Had thought public about internet in advance, it might have had the opportunity to be harmful to society. Thus, unlimited communication could play a significant role in having a dangerous connection.
To capitulate, I firmly believe that modern communication channels have more advantageous aspects. However every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ays, communication channels have become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'abounded'.
Suggestion: abounded
... of view, making a connection is indeed abound to making a friendship relation, which ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... far support the contention that having an easiest communicating to other people i...
^^
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'also the healthiest'.
Suggestion: also the healthiest
...elated with not only better society but also healthiest people from psychological aspects. Mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hannels have more advantageous aspects. However every garden may have some weeds, the l...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65037593985 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32152377837 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65037593985 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6475077508 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.636363636 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0796839923628 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032304017102 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364216974366 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0471923227645 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246560787649 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.