In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
Recently, the phenomenon of increasing proportion of older people and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that elder people are highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the population of old people in society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the socialist's standpoint, older people experiences can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that social experiences, as well as social developments, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of old ages. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both elder and experienced people apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social workers, older employees might increase the consequences of the negative effect on social performance. Moreover, fundamental aspects of pensioners relate to this reality that the demerits of the older people health care pertain to social expenditures. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of having the old population is correlated negatively with social drawbacks. Hence, it is correct to presume, the preconceived notion of country problems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using the older people in some careers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of old ages prove the significance of country problems, but also pinpoint societies implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'socialists'' or 'socialist's'?
Suggestion: socialists'; socialist's
...that throughout this essay. From the socialists standpoint, older people experiences ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60299625468 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2208649054 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2625929231 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221877620005 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717121683748 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425760597015 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123989341762 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495376306782 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.