Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree and disagree?
Morden medical facilities and technological advancements in the healthcare sector have brought wonders to the world. We have cures for deadly diseases and researchers are working on our genes to prevent diseases even before we are born, which lead to increased lifespan. I agree on the statement and welcome these advancements of medical technology. This essay will discuss the merits of medical advancements and provide a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the first and foremost, people can have more active life with an increasing life expectancy. They have better diet habits, more exercise schedules and that not only contribute to their family but to society also. In most countries, government look experienced people as an active workforce rather than burden to society. For example, professors, researchers and lawmakers have vast experience and could contribute more than the youngster in their respective fields. Therefore, increased life expectancy allows people to contribute in society and help the younger generation.
To continue with, as a direct result of increased lifespan, people can spend more time with their families and grandchildren. Parents can leave their children in safe hand while they are at work. The way grandparents love and care for their grandchildren is incomparable to the attention they would receive at the day-care centre. For instance, my niece stays with her grandparents while her parent at work, she gets all love, attention and new learning everyday which she didn’t get at day-care centre. Hence, we need our parents and grandparents to be with us than ever before.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that increased life expectancy by medical technology greatly benefits the family as well as our society and they are no longer a burden but assets for the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ntribute to their family but to society also. In most countries, government look exp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ts all love, attention and new learning everyday which she didn't get at day-care c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41034482759 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92491247062 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.96323053 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127244516814 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442467186688 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428885023983 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857753160431 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369404120228 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.