Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in people believing that governments should construct more roads to accommodate more vehicles. There is a widespread worry that this would only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious consideration.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that public transport is the only way to reduce traffic on the roads. Not only can the improved network of public transport reduce traffic jams in the peak hours, but it can also decrease the environmental degradation caused by the increased number of cars. Needless to say, all these benefits stand government in good stead as far as clean environment is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect is that thanks to the public transport, it will be more affordable for people with low income as students and elderly people. Furthermore, private car users will be motivated to use public bus as they will be able to save money that they used to spend on petrol. Hence, it is apparent why public transport is necessary rather than investing money on constructing roads.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of strengthening public transport infrastructure are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, so, then, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95412395553 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597285067873 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5939375843 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250115111897 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747584045079 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729652746437 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125183829611 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374522197929 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.