Some people work for long hours to achieve success and some give importance to free time. compare and discuss these issues.
Recently, the phenomenon of being hard workers vs giving importance to free time and their corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that achieving success is highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that long hours of work can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the success standpoint, working hard and long can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that job promotions and climbing career ladder are intertwined inextricably with not only job satisfaction but also successful personality. According to my own experience, when I was a university experiment, I conducted an academic experiment which discovered innovattions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both leisure activities and job prospects apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, giving importance to leisure time might increase the consequences of becoming a lazy person. Moreover, fundamental aspects of workaholic persons would relate to this reality that the demerits of peer presure pertain to lower self-steem. As a tangible example, a scientific studey undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of being inactive is correlated negatively with mental difficulties. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of powerful experiment.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of setting a balance between work and free time far outwigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of psycological logics prove the significance of successful manners, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.ot only do the advantages of psychological logic prove the significance of successful manners, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72852233677 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32673382195 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.90364071 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.916666667 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156287055825 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491702216141 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471451310625 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863968340698 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467364963478 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.