Some universities deduct marks from students work if given in late, what are the problems and what is your opinion?

Essay topics:

Some universities deduct marks from students work if given in late, what are the problems and what is your opinion?

Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people has changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals deducting marks for late submission has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussions. People have always intrigued to analyse and explain the impact of this rule in pupil's life. Regarding this, I would say.....

There are several problems related to this issue. First of all, this stringent rules makes students generating negative psychological image of the respective tutor. Due to this, individual becomes anti against him and this may have exacerbating consequences. Another reason is that, students gets over burdened with academic pressure and they may even take wrong step like committing suicide. This is because, some individual can not cope up with the intense pressure and social burden.

In my opinion, colleges and universities should be lenient with their academic students. The reason for this, every individual has different family background and we are not aware of his financial conditions and from what situation he is going on. Furthermore, students come to learn education and not to make assignments rather, so leniency is mandatory.

Hence based on the arguments above, I want to stress that rules and regulations should be made in universities but with keeping in minds its psychological effects on individual's mind.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... always intrigued to analyse and explain the impact of this rule in pupils life....
^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and explain the impact of this rule in pupils life. Regarding this, I would say...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ts rather, so leniency is mandatory. Hence based on the arguments above, I want to...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, so, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35135135135 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8901653514 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689189189189 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9410808671 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3846153846 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137915939404 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397348713634 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354758565079 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707833620718 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422803100169 0.0609392437508 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.