What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in digitalized world?
In this day and age, technology has taken many burdens far away from us which has led to many problems in contrast. One such example is lazy journalism which has become very common in these days.
This is nothing but, the repeated information being spread from different sources. My opinion about this topic is, the drawbacks overweight the benefits. The following essay says about some of the problems of this activity.
To begin with, due to the growth of internet, world - wide - web and social media, the deliverance of vast information to the general public becomes possible in a fraction of time. This made many journalists or writers to copy the same information in different platforms to the general public. Most of the times, the news says about irrelevant things which says about incorrect headline and the actual content.
For instance, some of the writers even publish the content in the website without even doing spell checks which have resulted in poor management of the content to the people. In most of the cases, false details have been delivered which have resulted in many problems to the society. Because of all the above factors, the ideology behind good journal is getting destroyed due to such actions.
To conclude, the general web users must be always aware of the right platform for going through any valuable information or news instead of reading the poor resources. Therefore, by considering all the above factors, I could conclude that, the problems always overweight the merits of lazy journalism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...enefits. The following essay says about some of the problems of this activity. To begin ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... deliverance of vast information to the general public becomes possible in a fraction of time....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...formation in different platforms to the general public. Most of the times, the news says about...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 15, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nd the actual content. For instance, some of the writers even publish the content in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05511811024 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55533248739 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574803149606 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 8.0 1.56157635468 512% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5250987711 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7692307692 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0949665860159 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353302084916 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371021829878 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501912584693 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020629743569 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.