TPO49-The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether the ability to keep longtime friendships in a small group is more significant to have pleasure than the ability to find new friends easily has received a great deal of attention from people and psychologists. Although some may argue that people who find new friends in a easy way have better ability to be happy, I as well as any others believe that the ability to retain the relationships with a few people but for a long time could bring happiness because they know each other well, and the following explanations wil further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, a paramount reason why it is better for the people to have the ability to keep their friends for a longtime is that having a few old friends could be helpful for their life. This means that people who own a old relationship with their firends can rely on them in different circumstances due to the reason that they know either each other's interests or fears; so, they could satisfy themseleves by this knowledge.
A further reason for this view is that, by keeping few friends for a long period, people are not enforced to conflict with their friends. Since the number of friends are low and they familiar with each other for a long time, they would have fewer contractions among each others. As a matter of fact, few friends with long relationship through the time could make much more in common due to the reason that would not invovle in a large number of ideas of distinctive people; thus, they would have pleasanet time with each other.
Finally, it is occasionally said that trust is the more significant factor to have happy friendship and this would not be achieved but with the pass of the time. It is axiomatic that throughout the history people could not be able to trust to the large groups of people; therefore, they experienced that it is better for them to diminished their relationships' circle. Some experts believe that having a trust-based friendship chould bring them satisfaction due to the reason that not only are they not worried about their privacy but also they could open up themselves for their friends easily.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, I can draw the concolusion that the ability to have a few friends but in a long period bring about happiness chiefly due to the reasons that this relationships are more trusful and pleasant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... argue that people who find new friends in a easy way have better ability to be happy, I as w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gue that people who find new friends in a easy way have better ability to be happ...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...further elaborate on this perspective. First and foremost, a paramount reason w...
^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...e the ability to keep their friends for a longtime is that having a few old friends could ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ir life. This means that people who own a old relationship with their firends can...
^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...to the reason that would not invovle in a large number of ideas of distinctive people; thus, they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ppiness chiefly due to the reasons that this relationships are more trusful and plea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in brief, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79474940334 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67141956199 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439140811456 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3414004654 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.636363636 100.406767564 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0909090909 20.6045352989 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333480628825 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149310533991 0.076458572812 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774347160877 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202212676566 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893600662335 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 11.7677419355 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 10.002688172 295% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.