The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.

The pie chart compare the proportion of water usage for Agriculture, Domestic and industry proposes worldwide and the bar chart illustrates how 4 different countries spend their water in 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that China and India spent predominant amount of water to agriculture sector while Industry sector was the main consumer of water in Canada. New Zealand spent the majority of water on Agriculture and Domestic sectors.
In 2000, Agriculture sector was the main user of water around the world that accounted for 70%, compared to 22% for Industry sector. Domestic sector used the least amount of water, at just 8%. .
With regards to selected countries, India spent a hefty 92% of water for agriculture sector and just 8% of water to Domestic and Industry sectors, where 3% was for former sector. China and New Zealand spend for agriculture sector 69% and 44% respectively. While domestic sector consumed 46% of water in New Zealand, China spent on it 5 times less. Industry sector in China used 22% of water, in contrast New Zealand spend on in two times less.
In contrast, Canada spent on Agriculture sector 10% and ten times more on Industry sector. Domestic sector used there 12% of country’s water.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the least amount of water, at just 8%. . With regards to selected countries, In...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, as for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64015644486 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473170731707 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3892977113 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169875924696 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911598288638 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696282203464 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130365549625 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580181388415 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.