The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart depicts the major reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. In addition to this the given table illustrates the causes of land degradation in North America, Europe and Oceania during the 1990s in percentage. It also displays the cause of degradation for each reason as well.
It is evident from the pie chart that over-grazing, over-cultivatioin and deforestation are the major factors for the degradation of land. Almost all these factors are equally responsible for the degradation of land. Among all the 3 factors over-grazing is the main reason with 35% of contribution to the land degradation. While, over-grazing is the second highest factor with 30% of contribution followed by over-cultivation’s 28%. The remaining 7% of land degradation is because of other factors.
The table shows that Europe had the utmost land degradation of all 3 countries with 23 % of land degradation during the 1990s. Whereas, Ocenaia and North America had 13% and 5% of total land degraded. In Europe, all the major factors discussed had played an equal role but deforestation played the major role in the land degradation. Whereas, deforestation had only 0.2 % of contribution to the total land degradation in North america with over-cultivation being the main reason for the degradation. This is contrast to the Oceania’s 0% of land degradation caused by over-cultivation. In Oceania over-grazing had the highest part in land-degradation.
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville prove that Corporateville is a superior place to live then Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp’s current headquarters. Moreover, M 35
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of degradation for each reason as well. It is evident from the pie chart that ov...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, well, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 3.97073170732 579% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41739130435 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.61814360399 2.65546596893 136% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469565217391 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3371903163 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 1.13902439024 966% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19275185975 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842387520861 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750584956194 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159957248744 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074835327249 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.