All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
In order to stay tow to tow with competition, companies need to be operate efficiently. This can only be done if the company is aware of the latest market trends and latest development in the field that they are operating in and also eliminating internal problems that are holding back companies to operate efficiently. The best way to get to know about these trends is to rely on their own employees competence rather than outside consultants due to two main reasons.
Firstly, in most cases companies makes sure that they hire best candidates in their organisation, they make sure that the employee is adept and are passionate about the company before hiring them. These employees work regularly for the company and knows in's and out how the company works and what department needs improvement for the company to work faster and more efficiently.This will also help company save money which can be utilised for companies self development. The employees keep up to date of the market trends for their own careers and using that knowledge for the good use of company can help them operate more efficiently moving forward. For example, an employee of a IT technology company will keep a track on the latest technological market trends to stay relevant in his job, also he would know how the company is compatible to those market change, hence, utilising that information for future decisions of the company will benefit the company more than outside consultants who barely know how the company works.
Secondly, as the employees get paid by the company, they want their company to grow and make more money, so that they can make more money. Hence, companies who listen to their own employees are bound to get much more reiliable and trustworthy advice regarding companies policies and work culture and advancements. Especially older and much more experienced employees that have been with the company for years. Whereas, outside consultants cannot be trusted to give you reliable information as they can might give you popular suggestions that they give to other companies, but those decision might not work for all.
In contrary, there can be some cases where workforce of a company is not much experienced and the company is itself a samll company or a start up. Such companies should take outside consultants as they will have much more experience and knowledge of current market trends and how to build a company up by creating a proper base.
In conclusion, relying on companies workforce is much better way for a company to operate more efficiently than hiring outside consultants because the employees knows what is best for the company and their suggestions are much more reliable than outside consultants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'hire the best'.
Suggestion: hire the best
...st cases companies makes sure that they hire best candidates in their organisation, they ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...any to work faster and more efficiently.This will also help company save money which...
^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: a; IT
...ng forward. For example, an employee of a IT technology company will keep a track on...
^^^^
Line 9, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...oper base. In conclusion, relying on companies workforce is much better way for a comp...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03097345133 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72727584206 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435840707965 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6446237837 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.428571429 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2857142857 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490996081722 0.243740707755 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206773770693 0.0831039109588 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774639425892 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330050266627 0.150359130593 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555612472144 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.