Excessive traffic has made cities unpleasant places to live and work in. For this reason, private cars should be completely banned from city centres. To what extent do you agree or disagee?
As heavy traffic in the cities make its landscapes ugly, making it difficult to live and work in. So, private vehicles should be completely cordoned off from the central parts of the cities. I completely agree with this idea of banning certain vehicles for several reasons.
There are several reasons as to why personal transport is the part and parcel of the huge problem of traffic congestion in cities. Firstly, with more people tending to own multiple vehicles for the sake of their own comfort, peak traffic conditions are bound to happen. At the same time, cities are failing to accommodate the vehicular influx, due to lack of infrastructure. Secondly, reckless car owners park their vehicles in areas demarcated for other public uses or meet accidents, creating a nuisance and difficulties for general public. For these reasons, cities have a dirty outlook and its citizens bear the misery.
In my opinion, prohibiting only the personal cars in city centres would definitely be a good idea to control traffic. Firstly, prohibition of such automobiles, would not only force the people to opt for public transportation services, but also ease the traffic conditions of the whole city in general. secondly, office goers would be able to reach their destinations in timely manner, even in the peak hours of dawn and dusk, making their lives simpler. Further, people would not have to face, the damaging noxious pollutants from heavy vehicular activity, thus improving the air quality. Therefore, banning private motorcars from city centres will be a relief for everyone.
In conclusion, I believe that as traffic makes lives of the people miserable, banning personal cars in city’s main areas is a valid thing to do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 528, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...reating a nuisance and difficulties for general public. For these reasons, cities have a dirty...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 303, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...onditions of the whole city in general. secondly, office goers would be able to reach th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20567375887 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72471756529 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.056789532 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321199648528 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110494847736 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648910057924 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207488243653 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654359786289 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.