The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem

Essay topics:

The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?

In recent days, the intensive manufacture of consumer commodity inflicts a significant harm to natural environment. In this essay, I am going to explain the culprits of this serious problem and give some solutions to alleviate it.
There are many reasons why some individuals argue that the growth in the yield of consumer goods has detrimental effects on the environment. First is an upward trend in plastic waste. This is because, the producers nowadays show preference to use plastic as it is convenient and inexpensive. As the result, this phenomenon leads to many hazardous problems such as global warming, soil deterioration due to its indestructibility. Secondly, overproduction can make people misspend, hence increasing the amount of domestic waste and littering which poses a higher risk to people health.
The solution of this matter is various. The role of government is the key element to solve it effectively. They should set in motion some strict rules about the using of plastic bags and give punishments to those who do not obey. Secondly, enhance educating individuals about the consequences of consumer goods on the environment such as leading to serious illnesses like respiratory diseases, decreasing immune system and cancer.
In conclusion, two primary causes why manufacturing more consumer goods leading the higher risk of the environment are the growth in plastic products and the extravagance of people. The authorities hold a considerable role to tackle this problem by posing laws and punishments to reduce the amount of plastic, moreover, enhance the perception of individuals about the deleterious effect of this phenomenon is also a great idea.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-08 nguyenanh9182 89 view
2023-08-28 hieu13092006 89 view
2023-08-27 Charles Le 84 view
2023-08-11 quynhanhbuiviet 78 view
2023-06-19 hieu13092006 61 view
Essays by user tranvuongphuongmy :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37121212121 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14023147539 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587121212121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2231177681 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258323255611 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804413178637 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482539058971 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153829619888 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311849992802 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.