Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people argue that it is better to travel solo, instead of tour guide. They cite that advance in technology does not need tour guide, the location of any place can be find out by google within seconds to support their view points. However, in my opinion, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that travel guided by tour guide outweigh the travel followed by no one. I will support my view point for two reasons.
To begin with, it is so effective to travel in the guidance of tour guide because one can able to know about ancient history of indigenous place in better way. For instance, once I have visited Taj mahal in lndia, I was able to view closely and learn whole history of Taj mahal that how king made it in memory of his beloved queen and about their whole affair as well as their family background, and it was just possible due to native local guide. If I were not guided by native tour guide then I could not able to know about this palace more precisely. It is important to learn about local ancient monuments and archeology of any place because it helps to widen our mind and changes our perception to view world differently. Thus, for efficacy of travel local guide encourages on to view old history in smooth way.
Secondly, if travel supervise by the indigenous tour guide the cost of travel become less which is obviously flexible than solo traveling. For example, one can be victim of native scammer if there is no local guide, and the scammer can take even double or triple than actual price of commodities. If tour is guided by local man then he will definitely take traveler to cheap places and even bargaining with shopkeeper in behalf of his clients. It is pivotal to have less cost because for bag packer traveler or tourist low cost of items in many countries encourages them to be explore new environment and learn different culture and traditions. Therefore, the travel in the supervision of native guide helps to cut cost and encourages traveler to travel more.
To sum up, the issue of whether its best way to guided by tour guide while traveling is complex. Some suggested that it is not great idea to travel in control of tour guide due to modern technology one can guide themselves and google can guide well than tour guide. Nevertheless, I still contend that it is great way to travel in supervision of tour guide and that helps to know ancient local history in better way and cost of travel will reduced due to local guide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ust possible due to native local guide. If I were not guided by native tour guide ...
^^
Line 7, column 440, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...y in better way and cost of travel will reduced due to local guide.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5797752809 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37969358275 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447191011236 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8462462402 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.882352941 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1764705882 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22348747753 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950505627329 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068509216525 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159817949085 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503167985425 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.