Downtown Zurzi is becoming increasingly congested with traffic, increasing the commuting time for those who work downtown or near downtown. The nearby city of Loft was faced with the same problem several years ago and implemented a small weekly tax for dr

Essay topics:

Downtown Zurzi is becoming increasingly congested with traffic, increasing the commuting time for those who work downtown or near downtown. The nearby city of Loft was faced with the same problem several years ago and implemented a small weekly tax for driving one's car downtown, Downtown traffic almost immediately subsided in Loft and the local government also raised much-needed money for fixing the roads elsewhere. obviously, this plan should be implemented in Zurzi in order to solve the brewing traffic congestion problem.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

The author suggested that in order to reduce traffic issue in downtown zurzi, the governament should levy minute taz to the people who travel to near downtown.And, to bolster his/her claim author stated the example revealing information of several years ago where when loft city was facing same trouble and immplemented the rule of small tax, come across solution very quickly, And this can also help government in gethering some fund for transfering roads.this argument have lack of evidences and and my critical aspect on it has been justified in ensuing paragraph.

Firstly, the author must give firm evidences put light on argument saying how trafic congestion problem of zurzi downtown would be resolved like in case of loft's downtown despite of taking into account the number of things such as characteristics and feature of both the downtown. There might be a possibilities that both the downtown varies in number of residents living in town.Additionally, total use of vehicles may also be wavier.Thus, without careful scrunity author can not conclude that the same rule applied as in city of loft will beequally appropriate for zurzi downtown.

Secondly, The writer without rulling out concluded that the levy small tax can be beneficial as in loft's city.However, the opulence of people in both the places can not be equal. may be, people living in loft city are financially stable to pay extra tax to use roads. where as, individuals from zurzi downtown had not have enough money to pay extra taxes and would face trouble if required to do give more money to government for road use. so, this argument is unsustanible as it stands. instead, to overcome this problem government should promote some awarness where people can help others by giving lift to the near town. The increment in amount of public transport with affordable ticket rates are also a good idea to reduce traffic congestion.other than this, promoting use of public transport such as bus, train and publicize the even-odd policies as in other countries would be more benificial to degrade vehicular traffic in zurzi downtown.

Lastly, author stated that collected money will be contrite in fixing road elswhere. Although, instead of tranfering road somewhere else, government can implement over bridge which indeed reduce traffic issue can be a good idea. To improve road condition or further improvments, goverment should use money from fund collected by various sources rather than give extra burden of paying extra taxes on locality.this argument is unacceptable and government can adopt new poicies for road establishment such as gethering money from wealthy people such as politicians, businesman and so on.

In sum, i concede that the lack of evidences have made this argument unjustified. To convince me, author required to submit firm evidenceds that after levying small tax just as loft city did will reduce the traffic in zurzi downtown. Moreover, people from zurzi will have no economically problem paying extra tax.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The author suggested that in order to reduce traffic issue in...
^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
... the people who travel to near downtown.And, to bolster his/her claim author stated...
^^^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ross solution very quickly, And this can also help government in gethering some f...
^^
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ds.this argument have lack of evidences and and my critical aspect on it has been justi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a possibility' or simply 'possibilities'?
Suggestion: a possibility; possibilities
...re of both the downtown. There might be a possibilities that both the downtown varies in number...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
...s in number of residents living in town.Additionally, total use of vehicles may also be wavi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...otal use of vehicles may also be wavier.Thus, without careful scrunity author can no...
^^^^
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pplied as in city of loft will beequally appropriate for zurzi downtown. S...
^^
Line 9, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... tax can be beneficial as in lofts city.However, the opulence of people in both the pla...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...le in both the places can not be equal. may be, people living in loft city are fina...
^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...y stable to pay extra tax to use roads. where as, individuals from zurzi downtown had...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...y stable to pay extra tax to use roads. where as, individuals from zurzi downtown had no...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 319, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...individuals from zurzi downtown had not have enough money to pay extra taxes and wou...
^^^^
Line 9, column 441, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... more money to government for road use. so, this argument is unsustanible as it st...
^^
Line 9, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
... argument is unsustanible as it stands. instead, to overcome this problem government sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar traffic in zurzi downtown. Lastly, author stated that collected money will ...
^^
Line 15, column 9, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s, businesman and so on. In sum, i concede that the lack of evidences have...
^
Line 15, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple from zurzi will have no economically problem paying extra tax.
^^
Line 15, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...economically problem paying extra tax.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.9520958084 170% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 55.5748502994 130% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2540.0 2260.96107784 112% => OK
No of words: 487.0 441.139720559 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21560574949 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79440092209 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 204.123752495 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517453798768 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.957641465 57.8364921388 237% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.333333333 119.503703932 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4666666667 23.324526521 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.70786347227 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 5.25449101796 362% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260448855991 0.218282227539 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853753814621 0.0743258471296 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744081652073 0.0701772020484 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161725891091 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718032589434 0.0628817314937 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 14.3799401198 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.3550499002 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 98.500998004 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 12.3882235529 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 492 350
No. of Characters: 2471 1500
No. of Different Words: 245 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.71 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.022 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.652 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 186 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 128 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 91 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 25.437 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.631 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5