The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown:
" If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Last year, our neighboring town, Hayesworth, passed a law requiring that all households recycle paper and glass, or pay a fine. Since that time, Hayesworth has seen its garbage disposal costs significantly decreased. If we implemented an advertising campaign encouraging our residents to recycle, Masontown would also save money on disposal of its waste."
Garbage disposal in town a matter of big concern and responsibility. For a place to be devoid of potential disease or unwanted smelly spots, it is necessary that garbage disposal be strictly carried out. There are many kinds of wastes like bio-medical wastes, recyclable wastes, non-recyclable wastes or even bi-degradable wastes and all of these wastes need to be treated separately using different methods that are available today.
The current condition in Masontown is that the cost of garbage disposal is very high and the local government would want a reduction in the fees. It seems possible that, if every Masontown citizen is encouraged to recycle their waste, garbage disposal fees will substantially reduce. However this may not seem so.
Firstly, there is no statistical data given as to what percentage of waste generated in Masontown is recyclable waste. Keeping that in mind, if garbage disposal facilities are suddenly reduce, there would be too much waste generation if there is not much present to recycle. A rough statistical idea should be mentioned or should be known by the governing body so that they can take a correct decision as to whether it is really necessary to curb garbage disposal fees.
Secondly, considering that a statistical analysis is made and it is found that recyclable waste is more in quantity than other types, they might as well setup huge recycling plants, that could cost a lot at once and possibly more than what garbage disposal costs. It would probably take quite some time to build.
Thirdly, taking action just based on what result a neighboring town - Hayesworth has achieved, is preposterous. Each town has a different structure, economy, population, energy scheme and even waste management requirement. So just because a neighboring town has gotten results doesn't mean this town will too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...isposal fees will substantially reduce. However this may not seem so. Firstly, there...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...arbage disposal facilities are suddenly reduce, there would be too much waste generati...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...o that they can take a correct decision as to whether it is really necessary to curb garbage ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e a neighboring town has gotten results doesnt mean this town will too.
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238670694864 0.25644967241 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.172205438066 0.15541462614 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0996978851964 0.0836205057962 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0876132930514 0.0520304965353 168% => OK
Pronouns: 0.02416918429 0.0272364105082 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0996978851964 0.125424944231 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0513595166163 0.0416121511921 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.855407802 2.79052419416 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.02416918429 0.026700313972 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00302114803625 0.001811407834 167% => OK
Determiners: 0.0694864048338 0.113004496875 61% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0332326283988 0.0255425247493 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151057401813 0.0127820249294 118% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1851.0 2731.13054187 68% => OK
No of words: 301.0 446.07635468 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.14950166113 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378737541528 0.378187486979 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299003322259 0.287650121315 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209302325581 0.208842608468 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.135150697306 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.855407802 2.79052419416 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 207.018472906 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584717607973 0.469332199767 125% => OK
Word variations: 63.5068949113 52.1807786196 122% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.039408867 70% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5 23.2022227129 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3569415362 57.7814097925 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.214285714 141.986410481 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.2022227129 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.724660767414 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 51.4003322259 51.9672348444 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.37234042553 1.8405768891 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264331880218 0.441005458295 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0798226649638 0.135418324435 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.059342071387 0.0829849096947 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.560288583559 0.58762219726 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182453919714 0.147661913831 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103435129914 0.193483328276 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650086620593 0.0970749176394 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.212240381297 0.42659136922 50% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.117332852442 0.0774707102158 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157223672902 0.312017818177 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795262396498 0.0698173142475 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.