The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:
“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.”
Although the argument appears compelling at first, upon a more careful perusal, a few underlying questions are discovered which tend to threaten its validity.
Firstly, the autonomy of a country doesn't only depend on how well its borders are protected. A strong government, which is able to perform its duties without being influenced by foreign forces, is the most essential requirement for the autonomy of the country. If the government makes its decisions based on the wishes of other powerful countries, then the country can't be autonomous even with a well-protected border.
Moreover, the argument assumes that an increased number of illegal immigrants in a country is sure to harm the economy. This isn't necessarily true. In fact, the illegal immigrants living in the country may even help the growth of the economy, in the process of earning their livelihoods and forcing them to leave may have an adverse effect.
In addition to that, the argument states that illegal immigrants pose threats to the country. But that may not be the case all the time. There can be a lot of illegal immigrants out there, who fled their country simply to avoid the ongoing chaos back home and ensure a better future for their next generations. Making them return to their countries can be an inhumane idea.
To recapitulate, the argument fails to provide sufficient information to answer all the hidden questions. In order to properly asses he validity of the argument, further information is required.
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your p 58
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 41
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
.... Firstly, the autonomy of a country doesnt only depend on how well its borders are...
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: CANT
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...er powerful countries, then the country cant be autonomous even with a well-protecte...
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...untry is sure to harm the economy. This isnt necessarily true. In fact, the illegal ...
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'then', 'well', 'in addition', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209558823529 0.25644967241 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.161764705882 0.15541462614 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102941176471 0.0836205057962 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0514705882353 0.0520304965353 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0404411764706 0.0272364105082 148% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.102941176471 0.125424944231 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0404411764706 0.0416121511921 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80346376504 2.79052419416 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0441176470588 0.026700313972 165% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136029411765 0.113004496875 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0183823529412 0.0255425247493 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0147058823529 0.0127820249294 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1501.0 2731.13054187 55% => OK
No of words: 246.0 446.07635468 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.10162601626 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.57801047555 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.394308943089 0.378187486979 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317073170732 0.287650121315 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207317073171 0.208842608468 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130081300813 0.135150697306 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80346376504 2.79052419416 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 207.018472906 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613821138211 0.469332199767 131% => OK
Word variations: 64.8150644678 52.1807786196 124% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9230769231 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5882555306 57.7814097925 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 141.986410481 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.724660767414 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 50.6303939962 51.9672348444 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.39130434783 1.8405768891 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524152313309 0.441005458295 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123600314986 0.135418324435 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0811752872692 0.0829849096947 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.649422071024 0.58762219726 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.216689174799 0.147661913831 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225870830705 0.193483328276 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128692232752 0.0970749176394 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.313225581125 0.42659136922 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.112629616388 0.0774707102158 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309521845209 0.312017818177 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138627248559 0.0698173142475 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 6.46551724138 15% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.