Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author reporting the possibility of death as a result of innoculation have presented a faulted argument without proving or providing strong proofs and evidence for his claim which may have helped readers or listeners in understanding his report.
Firstly, from his report, he failed to mention the cause of Cow Flu which may range from insects, bacteria, viruses or fungi and conditions that enhance their proliferation or provide enabling environment for the causal agents. Researchers in medicine have always provided factors that makes a disease-causing agent to strive or thrive well in a particular environment and how to mitigate their proliferation.
Secondly, the researcher opining that many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were administered looks contentious as using 'might' to conclude is based on a guess which may never become a reality, also it negates the report that there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the innoculations. This statement has countered the former statement leaving readers confused.
Moreover, the author's report in the second sentence where he stated that there is a small possibility of death as a result of innoculation is unacceptable as he didn't provide any cogent science report, data or statistics that would help backup his conclusion. This is impossible except with reasons hence, it is germane he shares it with the readers.
Finally,the writer's conclusion that they cannot permit innoculations against cow flu has negated the whole report since he reported earlier that its use will save many lives. This limits the attainment of the goal of the report. This should have only been reported if he or she had provided an alternative.
Should we allow many to die because of the few that would die as a result of innoculation?
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 299 350
No. of Characters: 1500 1500
No. of Different Words: 167 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.158 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.017 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.904 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.182 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.659 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.369 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.72 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.157 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of innoculation have presented a faulted argument without proving or providing st...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion the cause of Cow Flu which may range from insects, bacteria, viruses or fungi...
^^
Line 15, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t of innoculation is unacceptable as he didnt provide any cogent science report, data...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...es it with the readers. Finally,the writers conclusion that they cannot per...
^^^^
Line 21, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... with the readers. Finally,the writers conclusion that they cannot permit inno...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 297.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24579124579 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99050559564 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.0475775885 57.8364921388 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 119.503703932 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 5.70786347227 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218555375999 0.218282227539 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775000136143 0.0743258471296 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10901132597 0.0701772020484 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11797990109 0.128457276422 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989538541642 0.0628817314937 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.3799401198 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32208582834 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 12.3882235529 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.