Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Many lives might be saved if we be certain that the inoculation again cow flu is properly administered in the infected areas. But the author also suggeted that there is a slight possibility that a person inoculated against the cow flu can die due to inoculation itself.
There are many parts which are missing or not coherent with the argument. There is no hist that suggests that how threatening is cow flu, is it detectable?, does the inoculation permanantly cure the dicease or just pacify the effect, how do we be sure that the cause of death if cow flu or the inoculation.
No word in argument suggets that how life threatening is cow flu. Is it as cancer that the chances of death are quiet high. It can be rapidly spreading disease like HIV. Without knowing the true nature of disease one can not determine the steps against.
Author is suggesting routine administration of all poplation in affected area, but there is no part which suggests how to detect the disease. The part which can tell the adverese effect of inoculation or overdose is missing. what if a healthy person takes the inoculation, will there be adverse effects, that part is not obviated from argument.
Author also missed to point out the real cure for the cow flu. The evidence that suggests that cow flu can be cured by inoculation is missing, on the other hand it suggests that it can not be cured with certain number of doses, thats why routine administration is required. If we can not detect that some person is infected or not how can we keep giving him doses and where should we stop.
Aper the argument there is a miniscule possibility that person will die because of inoculation itself. But author missed to point out the way to determine the cause of death. If we don't have a way to determine the cause of death, it is impossible to be sure that most deaths are caused by cow flu.
In summary, The argument is missing critical imformation, without knowing the points described above any move can cause more harm than good.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: But the author also suggeted that there is a slight possibility that a person inoculated against the cow flu can die due to inoculation itself.
Error: inoculation Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: suggeted Suggestion: suggested
Sentence: There is no hist that suggests that how threatening is cow flu, is it detectable?, does the inoculation permanantly cure the dicease or just pacify the effect, how do we be sure that the cause of death if cow flu or the inoculation.
Error: dicease Suggestion: disease
Error: hist Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: permanantly Suggestion: permanently
Sentence: No word in argument suggets that how life threatening is cow flu.
Error: suggets Suggestion: suggest
Sentence: Author is suggesting routine administration of all poplation in affected area, but there is no part which suggests how to detect the disease.
Error: poplation Suggestion: population
Sentence: The part which can tell the adverese effect of inoculation or overdose is missing. what if a healthy person takes the inoculation, will there be adverse effects, that
Error: adverese Suggestion: adverse
Sentence: Aper the argument there is a miniscule possibility that person will die because of inoculation itself.
Error: miniscule Suggestion: minuscule
Sentence: In summary, The argument is missing critical imformation, without knowing the points described above any move can cause more harm than good.
Error: imformation Suggestion: information
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 11 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 359 350
No. of Characters: 1617 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.353 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.504 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.546 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.118 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.573 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.344 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.646 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.122 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 7 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
... of inoculation or overdose is missing. what if a healthy person takes the inoculati...
^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... be cured with certain number of doses, thats why routine administration is required....
^^^^^
Line 11, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... to determine the cause of death. If we dont have a way to determine the cause of de...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 13.6137724551 140% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 358.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66759776536 5.12650576532 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61489068972 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45530726257 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5178294365 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8333333333 119.503703932 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.70786347227 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280977954334 0.218282227539 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923300208461 0.0743258471296 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807696476201 0.0701772020484 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144624499157 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106937300106 0.0628817314937 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.3799401198 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.