Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The argument made in the above paragraph is that, permit cannot be granted for inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered. The above argument is made on the evidence that there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations. Before the above argument can be made specific evidences are required in order for it to hold water.
Firstly, providing specific data, like an existing data for a country, state, or county. For example if there is a study of country, which describes number of people who were not affected by cow flu died as a result of routinely administered inoculations in compared to people who died due to cow flu without these routinely administered inoculations were greater could help to strengthen the argument. However if the numbers are the other way round then it will weaken the argument.
Secondly, providing study that shows the current cow flu medications are not fully reliable and hence risking them on the people on a regular basis can affect the overall health of a person can help weaken the argument.
Lastly, also providing the expense required to permit inoculations on routinely basis can help come to conclusion whether the authorised committee can afford such cost.
In conclusion, if an existing data or showing no other side effects and cost of implementing ht
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... could help to strengthen the argument. However if the numbers are the other way round ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 2260.96107784 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 226.0 441.139720559 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02212389381 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85024795132 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 204.123752495 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526548672566 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 705.55239521 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7867211491 57.8364921388 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.111111111 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 23.324526521 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.70786347227 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252478292626 0.218282227539 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101452370446 0.0743258471296 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105477217623 0.0701772020484 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111789607615 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921897758231 0.0628817314937 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.3799401198 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.