A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
The problem stated here is of a pet food company, the pet food company had to recall a certain amount of pet food as the clients complained of pets experiencing lethargy, vomiting and other signs of illness after consumption of the companies food. however, after these claims were made the pet company decided to retract their orders and found out the components present in these food items were pet-friendly. hence the food company further decided not to waste any resource on this investigation. after understanding the scenario mentioned by the author I strongly disagree with the conclusion made, the below two points would be elaborating on why the author's assumption is wrong.
any product is comprised of various components , mixed in various proportions. Although the food company has come clean in terms of the components they have used in this particular product i.e. all components are pet edible but their ration of mixing these components could be a problem. For example, if a component containing fiber is mixed in greater protion then the pet will tend to vomit more if say a component contains sleep-inducing food is mixed more then the pet will tend to sleep more etc. hence it is faulty and extremely disagreeable to just stop the pet food test on components edibility and consumption. The components ratio should also be tested.
Secondly, the pet food producing company has not run any prior tests of this food on pets. they have just validated the individual ingredients edibility and launched the product in the market. however, before launching such products it is inevitable to regressively test as this can turn out to be dangerous to the pets.
hence it can be concluded that just testing or checking whether certain products can be used by pets or not is not helpful the entire end to end(from proportion to production to feedings some pets )test should be performed before launching any food products in the market.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 325 350
No. of Characters: 1594 1500
No. of Different Words: 161 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.246 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.905 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.74 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 40.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 23.669 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.425 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.686 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.082 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...gns of illness after consumption of the companies food. however, after these claims were ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...fter consumption of the companies food. however, after these claims were made the pet c...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... in these food items were pet-friendly. hence the food company further decided not to...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
... in these food items were pet-friendly. hence the food company further decided not to...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...ste any resource on this investigation. after understanding the scenario mentioned by...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 655, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... points would be elaborating on why the authors assumption is wrong. any product is c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Any
... why the authors assumption is wrong. any product is comprised of various compone...
^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
...hors assumption is wrong. any product is comprised of various components , mixed in various p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oduct is comprised of various components , mixed in various proportions. Although ...
^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...tains sleep-inducing food is mixed more then the pet will tend to sleep more etc. he...
^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'components'' or 'component's'?
Suggestion: components'; component's
...eable to just stop the pet food test on components edibility and consumption. The componen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'components'' or 'component's'?
Suggestion: components'; component's
...mponents edibility and consumption. The components ratio should also be tested. Secondl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...n any prior tests of this food on pets. they have just validated the individual ingr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ingredients'' or 'ingredient's'?
Suggestion: ingredients'; ingredient's
...they have just validated the individual ingredients edibility and launched the product in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...and launched the product in the market. however, before launching such products it is i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...turn out to be dangerous to the pets. hence it can be concluded that just testing o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
...turn out to be dangerous to the pets. hence it can be concluded that just testing o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 325.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99076923077 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80014980807 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513846153846 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 705.55239521 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2730334802 57.8364921388 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.769230769 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 17.0 5.25449101796 324% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423013225302 0.218282227539 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162041228066 0.0743258471296 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179553134418 0.0701772020484 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265357187026 0.128457276422 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147347256326 0.0628817314937 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 98.500998004 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.