A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college aged children Therefore Seatown should institute a free tuition policy for its professo

Essay topics:

A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.

The author fails to account for numerous gaps like firstly Oceania University and Seatown University are different universities with different professors and different students, even their funding could be different. Secondly, even if assume that the Oceania and Seatown indeed have a lot of similar characteristics, still assuming that just because Oceania university has professors whose children are of college-going age same would be the case for Seatown university seems a little too far fetched. Thirdly, the author's assumption is unwarranted regarding a strategy that has worked for making current professors happy will likely lure new professors. Therefore, since the author conclusion is based on incomplete premises the argument is perhaps unwarranted up to some extent.

A study like the one presented by the author can vastly differ for different areas, as different areas imply different characteristics. Maybe the area near Oceania university comprises of residents who are professors and who have college-aged children. Even if this was the case for Seatown university, the author still needs to take into account the funding of the universities. Maybe Oceania university being a reputed university recieves a lot of funding to accomodate a scheme which waives off professor's children's tuition fees, same cannot be said for Seatown university. Hence, the author fails to provide enough context to justify his/her postion even if consider the argument liberally and allow for certain assumptions to be inherently valid, which very well might not be the case.

Secondly, the professors of Seatown university have to have college-aged children in the first place in order for the scheme to fullfill its intended purpose. Even if we assume that Seatown university's professor's have college aged children , the professors as well as the children must be willing to reach a common groudn for attending the university. Hence, the author fails to provide any evidence to prove his/her stance valid. Luring new professors also seems a task as the scheme is primarily concerned with providing free education to professor's children , implying that for new professors to join there must be a lot of professors's with college aged children looking for a job in firdt place.

As the argument fails to accont for numerous inconsistiencies, the agument is invalid on the gorunds of the evidence cited by the premises.

Votes
Average: 5.7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istics, still assuming that just because Oceania university has professors whose ...
^^
Line 1, column 517, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... a little too far fetched. Thirdly, the authors assumption is unwarranted regarding a s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
... Maybe the area near Oceania university comprises of residents who are professors and who ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...eania university comprises of residents who are professors and who have college-aged ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ys professors have college aged children , the professors as well as the children ...
^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng free education to professors children , implying that for new professors to joi...
^^
Line 5, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f professorss with college aged children looking for a job in firdt place. As ...
^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the evidence cited by the premises.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thirdly, well, as well as, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 378.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41798941799 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97540239137 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 705.55239521 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5161468012 57.8364921388 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.285714286 119.503703932 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.70786347227 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296572243065 0.218282227539 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113839900779 0.0743258471296 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817333224729 0.0701772020484 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180365739862 0.128457276422 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804700550196 0.0628817314937 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.3799401198 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.3550499002 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 14 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 380 350
No. of Characters: 2008 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.415 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.284 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.915 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 154 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 127 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.265 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.395 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.573 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.121 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5