Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. Recently another anthropologist, Dr. Karp, visited the group of islands that includes Tertia and used the interview-centered method to study child-rearing practices. In the interviews that Dr. Karp conducted with children living in this group of islands, the children spent much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. Dr. Karp decided that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture must be invalid. Some anthropologists recommend that to obtain accurate information on Tertian child-rearing practices, future research on the subject should be conducted via the interview-centered method.
The argument topic states that interview-centered method, used by Dr. Kalpa, is suitable for child-rearing practices in the island of Tertia. To bolster this claim, author reveals several assumptions; however, careful scrutiny of the evidences reveals that it little supports the authors argument. This argument rife with many holes, These fallacies I will explore in this essay.
First of all, author readily states that children spend more time with their family. Whereas, children how they spend their time with their biological parents. They freely involved with their parents or not. Perhaps they follow family by the force of family. What is their actual choices? They are happily spend their time with parents. It is needed to find out the actual reason of staying together.
The second and still weak assumption is that Dr. Kalpa drawn the conclusion about the culture of the Tertia through interview with the Tertian people. It depends upon, how much they are biased? Perhaps they are not telling the actual truth. Hence, it is totally foolhardy thought. Observation should be free from the belie. In order to get true conclusion, observer may take interview method from the neighbor of the Tertia.
Finally, Dr. Kalpa profound the statement of the Dr. Field. He has not given any fault and weakness; whereas, he express the opposite view. The culture does not totally depend upon the children. It is needed to study about the whole population. Author does not provide the details of the research, he is too quick to elicit the conclusion, Which is totally incomplete. It is better to take the fresh data from the all population then we can draw the conclusion.
To recapitulate, Interview-centered method gives the valid information, only if, participants are not cynical and give the real opinion. Otherwise, we can take the information of the Tertian peoples through the nearest neighbor of the island of Tertia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vidences reveals that it little supports the authors argument. This argument rife...
^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...es reveals that it little supports the authors argument. This argument rife with many ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dren spend more time with their family. Whereas, children how they spend their time wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... their actual choices? They are happily spend their time with parents. It is needed t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...hought. Observation should be free from the belie. In order to get true conclusion, obser...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 2260.96107784 71% => OK
No of words: 314.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14331210191 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69975236384 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557324840764 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.8473053892 57% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1640282931 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.2916666667 119.503703932 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0833333333 23.324526521 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156308836035 0.218282227539 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397400453544 0.0743258471296 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495135423094 0.0701772020484 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856377993751 0.128457276422 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426609753384 0.0628817314937 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.3799401198 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 48.3550499002 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.197005988 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.64 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.1389221557 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.