In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
We have heard many stories of heroes in the past, both histrionically and in reality, that some fought off hundreds of thousands of invasive junta out of the country’s territory, or some used his own body to save many innocent lives when a natural disaster stroke. Today, even though stories are widely told by media, I believe it is still common to meet daily life heroes without the press’ participation, and that in this modern life heroes are still extant despite anyone’s telling otherwise.
“A flower’s fragrance spreads without wind.” This saying is a true description to modern heroes in our society. It is true, though, that society finds it impossible to regard any living man or woman as a hero. Media has long controlled one’s reputation, steering people for or against it - to their purpose - but those stories about the reputation are plausible. Media, naturally designed to attract people’s attention, are used to headlines and views counts that they are in favor of breaking news . Furthermore, they hardly represent the ultimate truth about one’s fame, because however great their effort, they could never cover every aspects of a story. This is the reason why a hero in the eyes of media could not last for long. People will soon forget them; audience have no connection or emotion towards media’s heroes; these heroes are not for common lives. Instead, intimate men and women in touch with our lives leave the deepest trace and become our models, despite media’s influence.
Actually, heroes are not hard to find. They are people who is with full responsibility to complete their duty. Ordinary workers are heroes regardless of their occupation, and with or without the attention of the media. They harvest the best-quality products in the fields to serve the entire country; they run every machines in factories producing necessary goods for customers; they climb up to the sky fixing electrical wires for the citizen; they sail afar the sea to bring back fresh batch of fish and seafood. Simply accomplishing their duty, they make sure that normal life is sustainable and advancing. Without these heroes, the world would fall into chaos: society regard them as heroes without the needs of media’s promotion.
Heroes should be those who win the war. True! I have great respect to men and women fighting their own battles, which consequently implements less burden to the society. They are true heroes. Look around, and you will see a lot of people carrying mental and/or physical disorder who - despite their disability - never give up, still stand by their two feet, living to the fullest, making own money and becoming an inspiration to the community. Helen Keller is a well-known example in spite of timeline. Everyone has their own package. People fight against their sickness, their distress, their suppression, unanticipated unemployment, ect. All heroes need the help from residents to win the war, so giving a hand to these people does not make them any less of a hero, but bolsters their strength and willpower to win a great victory. Living itself and not becoming a burden already makes a great hero.
In conclusion, life has been, is now, and will be full of anonymous heroes. Media could grasp control of one’s reputation - either by polishing it up or throwing it away – but they will never fully illustrate real heroes in modern society: men and women living, working, and fighting in everyday life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 525, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... that they are in favor of breaking news . Furthermore, they hardly represent the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, well, in conclusion, in fact, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2945.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 573.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13961605585 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.724863192 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553228621291 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 891.0 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5874248826 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.074074074 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.62962962963 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165434369009 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050333301982 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522928791148 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845123029449 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484715304672 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.