The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
We are living in a continuous altering community where machines and digital devices play a superior role in almost every sides of life. The more modern society heads, the faster living pace it creates. Some people would assert that the increasing pace of today’s life is advantageous to problem solving. To a certain degree, I think this is true. But most of the time, it brings up trouble to human’s daily life.
In a changing world where people depend on smartphones and new modern techniques to survive, human’s natural processes in thinking, speaking, and acting must be in accordance with the device paces, which is a lightning pace. In the office, employees are easier to react to a customer’s demand, quicker to respond to complaints, and spend less time contemplating the consequences. Digital devices brainstorm for people so that brain is barely used; in fact, physical demand drops significantly to low level. New living or working pace means speeding, fast-paced, and more efficient to accomplish a single work-load. This results in a more stressful life with many health-related risks. Each year, thousands of people are diagnosed with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and other skeletomuscular diseases. Healthy mental condition is not guaranteed either with the fast pace of living. More and more people in crowded city are suffering from stress and loss of sleep at night. At daytime, workers encounter headache and stultification after a long, fast-paced meeting with compressed information to process. Their social life is at danger too. Getting to busy to act and react, speak and respond, people spend less time actually talking and listening to each other, which separate them even more apart. Fast-pacing lifestyle is running through the era, leaving its negative traits on human’s life.
On the other hand, fast pace in problem resolve is necessary to a certain condition. It promotes efficiency by accomplishing more work load, demonstrates an active lifestyle, pushes critical thinking forward. Rushing a dying traffic accident’s victim into the emergency room means there is small place for thinking but acting. Putting out a conflagration requires an incisive quick mind and hand. It cannot be denied that acting fast is, sometimes, a must to solve a problem. However, all we were talking is about high-speed, but the effectiveness should be maintained. So being quick is vital, but the more important matter is to fulfill a task sufficiently.
In conclusion, while high-speed lifestyle is mandatory in certain urgent cases, it still becomes nettlesome for humankind in a lot of aspects, regarding physical, mental and social health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...enied that acting fast is, sometimes, a must to solve a problem. However, all we were t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, regarding, so, still, while, i think, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38770685579 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04839162748 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614657210402 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.579004119 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.16 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.92 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138790470224 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378562757209 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299652886703 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073588349467 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410772632531 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.