All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world’s most persistent social problems
What are the world’s most persistent social problems? It ranges from Political, technological, cultural problems, among others. Nowadays, some people believe that all nations should come together to support the development of a global university designed to engage students to solve the world’s most persistent social problems, however others assert this is a wrong idea. The prompt suggest that all nations should contribute to the development of a worldwide university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world’s most persistent social problems. After weighing the evidence, I disagree that all nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of finding solutions to the world’s most persistent social problems for three reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the development of a global university comes with a lot of merits that cannot be overemphasized. At the center stage, a global university fosters relationship between countries. For instance, the United States of America and China have been known for their rancorous relationship over the years, If students from the USA and China meet at a global university, they can be opportune to participate in the development of a new technology, a project that will involve all students from different countries, and promote relationship between the two countries, however, there will always be an aftermath. This kind of research allows students to tolerate each other as everyone has a unique characteristics, since they have a common goal which is to achieve success in the research, they will share ideas and knowledge in the process as well as learn even though little about other countries’ culture. This looks easy on the surface, however it might be very difficult for students especially from countries with hostile relationship like USA and China are unable to tolerate each one another and this can lead to failure of the project embarked and even chaos among students and further lead to more animosity between countries. The illustration above shows that it would be quite difficult at the center stage to bring students from all nations together to solve a common problem.
Further, even if the example above is true that students from nation with hostile relationship can work together, it can still be flawed. Language barrier is another limitation. In world today, there are many languages, the most common one are English, French, Portuguese and Spanish. Which language will be adopted by the global university? This is a big challenge as lecturers cannot be delivered in different languages even though it might be possible to achieve, it will be very expensive and time-consuming to achieve. The global university will have to employ a lecturer for various subjects in different language or provide a translator for students in their own language. Research says that students are more likely to perform well at a university if they are taught in the language. For instance, a student from France will have difficulty learning in a Spanish or English medium.
Moreover, a global university will require a general exam or test to be done by students from all nations to get admitted. Since it’s a global university, there will be specific requirements which not all students in all nations might be able to meet which makes this idea not even-handed as some students from certain countries meet the requisites while others will not. For example, if the global university decides to require either English or French language requirement to be considered for admission, students from nation like Brazil, Argentina, and other non-English or non-French speaking nation will be ineligible to apply at the global university. The above example illustrates that the adoption of a global university by all nations might be a subjective one and will not solve any world’s social problems, instead create more.
From the aforementioned examples, it’s evident that even though the development of global university will engage students in solving world’s most persistent social problems, the limitations it comes with cannot be jettisoned. I hereby conclude that all nations should not agree in the development of a global university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t social problems, however others assert this is a wrong idea. The prompt sugges...
^^
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., however others assert this is a wrong idea. The prompt suggest that all nation...
^^
Line 2, column 701, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'characteristic'?
Suggestion: characteristic
...ate each other as everyone has a unique characteristics, since they have a common goal which is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 861, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
...owledge in the process as well as learn even though little about other countries’ cu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 98.0 58.6224719101 167% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3644.0 2235.4752809 163% => OK
No of words: 687.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30422125182 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11963717896 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9089423497 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.406113537118 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1145.7 704.065955056 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.1019752631 60.3974514979 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.76 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.48 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447220861534 0.243740707755 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167519941204 0.0831039109588 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173715641652 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334331378677 0.150359130593 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238486358428 0.0667264976115 357% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.