All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Listening to employees can be more beneficial for the company than hiring some outside consultant who knows very little about a company's work culture.
Listening to the needs of employees and making appropriate changes in day to day working of the company can increase satisfaction level of the employees which in turn can lead to happy work environment. Many recent studies have shown that happy work environment can lead to increase efficiency. Moreover, a happy workplace can help in retaining valuable employees and reduce the attrition rate. Reduced attrition rate can help companies to divert their resources and money from hiring new people to the core product of the company.
Different companies have different work culture and challenges based on the field in which they operate. Not all the outside consultants may be familiar to the field in which the company operates and thus may not be able to provide a good solution to increase the efficiency. Also, it would be a long process as the outside consultant may take time to get adjusted to a company's culture.
Outside consultant may be useful in certain situation where a highly specialized skillset is required to solve a problem and people with a such a skillset are not available in a companies workforce. However, such instances are very rare and thus listening to employees is a far better option to improve efficiency.
A happy workplace has many advantages and it can be achieved by listening more to employees needs and concerns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to get adjusted to a companys culture. Outside consultant may be useful in cert...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... such a skillset are not available in a companies workforce. However, such instances are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 33.0505617978 15% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 249.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08835341365 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81414652328 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510040160643 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7234390166 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.181818182 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31361230905 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125593486752 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104283602109 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192525405694 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102741124535 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.