All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
In this fast growing world, industrialisation and formation of advent of new companies is not at all surprising. More often, companies who are starting as new player in the field often face intricate issues than other company who is there on the field for quite a long time. So, these new companies often hire outside consultants to lessen the burden imposed on higher officials. Thus, a proper employee-firm relationship is not established. in fact, a more pragmatic view would be to discuss the problems with the fellow employees and find a solution collectively. Hence, the given argument suggest the same of what would be a right and effective thing to do.
Consider the example of FLIPKART: an E-Commerce startup company in India. It takes every employee's idea and thought into consideration( feedback by the employees assert the same) and is able to operate efficiently in the market, maintaining a healthy employee-company relationship. Flipkart is known for taking care of its employees in a very good way by providing extra amenities, perks, insurance to its employees. This type of policy will not only motivate an employee, but also make him more dedicated and efficient towards his duties and responsibility in the company. However, if flipkart would have higher a consultancy firm to solve its internal issues, it would have results not only in discordance among higher officials and employees, but also an organisational between the company and the employees. Thus, it is a plausible case that the company would not work efficiently.
Furthermore, consider the example of Facebook: a social network firm, which allows people to share their live experience on their website. In an interview by a news channel with the CEO of the company Mark Zuckerberg, he was asked that where his CEO cabin is? he replied that he doesnt have a cabin instead he has his desk as of a normal worker in the same company. The point from this example is that if a company maintains a good employee relationship it will not need a consultancy firm to sort their issues out instead feedback and ideas from the employees will help the company grow in a faster rate.
Although, a reasonable person would suggest that new companies had to have a consultancy firm suggesting them the operation of the same. This case is only true only when the official or the employees of the company lack experience on the subject of the conundrum faced by the company. Nonetheless, it would be more beneficial if the company hire experienced employees and then discuss the problems with them to solve the problem.
In a nutshell, iF a company wants to grow at a fast rate then it would be more beneficial if it focuses in promoting heathy employee-firm relationship rather than relying on a consultancy firm. Although, if a jump start is needed then it can hire a consultancy firm to direct them a correct path, but it should be only present for a short period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...e-firm relationship is not established. in fact, a more pragmatic view would be to...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a right and effective thing to do. Consider the example of FLIPKART: an E-C...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...tartup company in India. It takes every employees idea and thought into consideration fee...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e company would not work efficiently. Furthermore, consider the example of Fac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... was asked that where his CEO cabin is? he replied that he doesnt have a cabin ins...
^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...re his CEO cabin is? he replied that he doesnt have a cabin instead he has his desk as...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp the company grow in a faster rate. Although, a reasonable person would sugg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lp the company grow in a faster rate. Although, a reasonable person would suggest that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lems with them to solve the problem. In a nutshell, iF a company wants to gro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 367, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t it should be only present for a short period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly present for a short period of time.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2452.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91382765531 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95295732241 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480961923848 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1867587499 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.761904762 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7619047619 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375641264454 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112906250876 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709415940753 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227307033919 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067315625831 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.