People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The argument broached in this prompt is almost agreeable to a large extent that a person should follow logic than emotion when making a decision. An emotional decision often leads to afterwards remorse and guilt or regret. However, when the stakes are low i-e, when the consequences from the decision not that rigid and if it favors edifying pf your close ones than emotional decision can be proved helpful.
if we take a situation where the decision making not only affect yourself but rather a group of people, then it is considered prudent to take decision with the logical flow rather than emotional flow. For example, if a person is a senior executive in a firm and his/her views and decisions matter to a lot to company's profit and loss then certainly the decision should be made with proper logic. However, if the same person makes a decision emotionally considering his stature and other sentimental factor like, condition of his personal life, personal anxiety, and tries to justify the untenable then it will probably lead to the downfall of himself and company as well. So, it will be considered a poor decision making ability by such an important person of the company can certainly go towards negative aspect of company's progress and the person as well.
Furthermore, considering a case of one's personal life. For example- if a person compromises his/her career for some another person because he/she is smitten with another person than it not guaranteed that he/she will live his/her life in harmony. Compromising ones career is a big step/decision which one should think with logic as well as emotion. Nonetheless, if the person only goes with innate sentiments while making above decision and tries to justify or advocate for the same with logic later on, will most probably regret it.
On the other hand, if the stakes are low while deciding something then the decision can be made emotionally considering that it is for the welfare of a group of people or of your clique. While a reasonable person might think that every decision should be taken logically, actually the proper balance of logic and sentiment can assure success. Justifying one's poor decision later on can certainly deteriorate one's situation in personal and professional life.
So from the above examples, it is clear that a decision should be a proper mixture of emotion and logic. An entirely logical decision is pernicious, so is an entirely sentimental decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ional decision can be proved helpful. if we take a situation where the decisio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... decision can be proved helpful. if we take a situation where the decision ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anys progress and the person as well. Furthermore, considering a case of ones ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er person because he/she is smitten with another person than it not guaranteed th...
^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e his/her life in harmony. Compromising ones career is a big step/decision which one...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er on, will most probably regret it. On the other hand, if the stakes are low...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...sion later on can certainly deteriorate ones situation in personal and professional ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in personal and professional life. So from the above examples, it is clear ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, well, while, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99756097561 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6771789871 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458536585366 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8099903186 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0625 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365900747359 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150706414337 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069230030111 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234348039261 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421864942177 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.