All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether a company should higher outside consultant to advice them and help or their own employees are sufficient for enhancing the growth of a company. Indisputably, all the companies wants to survive in the market according to the trends which are going on there. That's why they hire outside consultants who can advice them in such scenarios where the employees of the company may not provide much information. Nevertheless, employees knows many of the aspects regarding the growth of a company and its current trends with respect to the other company. Hence, the employees should be given a chance to provide their efficient views about how to make the company grow.
First of all, every employee wants the company to grow since it makes their own carrier better and provides them good opportunities for their future. For instance, if the company grows efficiently in terms of their annual turnover, then it benefits every employee in terms of their appraisal and company may provide additional bonus as well. This way employee will take much interest in completing their tasks and focus more on the success of company.
Furthermore, now a days, most of the companies have their branches in various sectors throughout a region or outside a region and they are cooperating with each other in terms of enhancing their efficiency without considering any outside consulting firm. For example, google has its headquarters in many countries including US, India, Japan, China, etc. and they're cooperating with each other, having live online meetings through which they are discussing the aspects of letting the company grow.
Finally, some employees in a company has great skills in every aspect and due to lack of their experience, they won't get any chance to grow or provide their suggestions to the company. Like most of the freshers are sanguine about working in a multinational firm and they're full of belligerent ideas which can increase the project funding due to enormously creative work. But due to their lack of experience company won't even think of their avid ideas for further process. These employees should be given a chance to speak up about the points which needs can further enhance the company growth.
Additionally, many employees have a capability and talent towards their work. Like in the textile industry, not all the employees have talent to create new and artful designs but some people have. These people should get a chance to present their work so that the company could know their talent and later consider them for company's growth.
In conclusion, although its a good idea for some startup companies to suggest and outside consultant in order to enhance the efficiency of company, most of the companies should consider their employees first for putting their points which makes the company grow. This could not only enhance the trust of company towards the employees but also takes them as well as company to another level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...to the trends which are going on there. Thats why they hire outside consultants who c...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...y they hire outside consultants who can advice them in such scenarios where the employ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...the success of company. Furthermore, now a days, most of the companies have their branc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...success of company. Furthermore, now a days, most of the companies have their branc...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...uding US, India, Japan, China, etc. and theyre cooperating with each other, having liv...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...out working in a multinational firm and theyre full of belligerent ideas which can inc...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 25, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...anys growth. In conclusion, although its a good idea for some startup companies ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2512.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08502024291 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59905784974 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3591769988 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.6 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.21951772744 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312938130568 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114719329507 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642544447569 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191445053806 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598488945983 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.