Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Is there an objectively right answer to that? There are always some pros and cons for everything. Similarly, these advancing new technologies have their fair share of goodness and badness with them. Many of us would say that it is an excellent method to bring advancement in teaching and learning methods. Others would argue that it has brought nothing but adversity with it. I believe that there are certain positive elements that come with electronic education but there are times when this technology fails to impart a certain amount of understanding about a particular subject. The advantages and disadvantages of these media for education can be comprehended through the examples of Medicine and Art.
Science has made an immense progress over the course of the 21st century and this trade seems interminable as long as the Earth exists. The ever growing progression of science and technology has worked wonders for different fields, especially Medicine. The avant-garde machinery and equipment has led the surgeons and physicians to discern and operate virtually in order to practice beforehand and foresee any complications that might occur during the actual surgery. These methods have been adopted by almost all the medical schools to instill their students with the best possible techniques and education that will assist them in becoming better doctors.
On the other hand, if Art students are taught through computers and videos. There might be very little left for them to imagine. Since Art is a field that dwells on wild imagination and idiosyncrasy. The electronic mode of teaching will be rendered useless in this scenario.
Yet, if we talk about primary schools adopting these methods of instruction and learning, it would not be wrong to say that students, from this early on should not be accustomed to this tradition because to me it is the age where they grasp more through actual scenery and sight of things and they apprehend a lot better if they see things in person and not just on a screen.
By my reckoning, electronic media of teaching and learning could prove beneficial in certain fields and at advanced levels of education. But in some cases this technology may be rendered incapable to do what it is set out for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'immense progress'.
Suggestion: immense progress
...f Medicine and Art. Science has made an immense progress over the course of the 21st century and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, similarly, so, still, well, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0752688172 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73258473036 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.8579751637 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104233972756 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273138862306 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269253214748 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053541467531 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259910865403 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.