Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
In my opinion, I disagree with the statement which suggests that it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
To begin with, in a well-known corporation, if a leader is considered not moral enough by peers, they would not will to follow, let alone to respect, him or her, since it would damage their reputation in the future.
Secondly, a person with no moral judgment will easily commit crimes without a slight notice. What makes worse is that the leader without moral judgment, he or she would persuade peers to do tasks that he or she doesn't even notice it's unmoral, and make them easier to be sued or put into jail, which makes a leader without the moral trait not maintain respect from employees.
I concede, for few employees, they do respect a leader not because the his moral judgment but because his tactiveness or determination to make the corporation profitable. However, the company's success is likely to be temporary because after the peers get what they want from the unmoral judgment leader, to protect themselves, they will soon leave the company to choose other more moral employers to work for.
Therefore, I disagree with the statement that it is not as important as a leader's ability to support the respect of his or her peers for the reasons provided above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rsuade peers to do tasks that he or she doesnt even notice its unmoral, and make them ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...s, they do respect a leader not because the his moral judgment but because his tactiven...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...tement that it is not as important as a leaders ability to support the respect of his o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 2235.4752809 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 232.0 442.535393258 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76724137931 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63205057886 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 704.065955056 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1135639203 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1428571429 23.4991977007 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 5.21951772744 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337075504652 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17616579224 0.0831039109588 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106516162308 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215479421427 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980926623991 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.