Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Moral values must always be considered whenever working with anyone. Whether it may be your seniors, juniors or peers. When a person is given a responsibilty of a leader he/she must be able to perfectly know the members that are working in the team. This will help build a stronger relationship between the members and the leader. Now this includes moral values as well. A persons moral values defines the persons upbringing and uplifts his/her position at a certain respectable point in the society. When selecting the team members the leader must always take into account the factor of Moral values of the person that is recruited in the team, whether he/she will be able to respect as well as tolerate others whilst working in a tight schedule or lose his temper while doing so.
The main point now comes is whether the same leader must keep these things in mind when he/she is dealing with his/her peers? Well, according to me, the leader must maintain an equal behaviour with his same category team members in terms of moral judgement. He/she must be a role model for everyone viz. maintianing the same values as he wants for others keep around when wroking in the palce. This will encourage others, who look up to him, under his supervision to do the same and maintain a respectful working environment.
A leader when not respects his/her peers may lead to disruptness in the unity of his/her team. It points out the hypocricy in the actions of the leader, who on one side keeps encouraging his subordiantes to balance and uplift each others morals and on the other side he himself, does not gives righful voice to his peers. This is not a quality of a good leader and may soon be the reason for his demise from that position by a person who cares and respects everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... may be your seniors, juniors or peers. When a person is given a responsibilty of a ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: A person; Persons
...Now this includes moral values as well. A persons moral values defines the persons upbrin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ell. A persons moral values defines the persons upbringing and uplifts his/her position...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
... on the other side he himself, does not gives righful voice to his peers. This is not...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67197452229 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42673696436 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506369426752 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7292885746 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222091929282 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849120224749 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614477346759 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170058552863 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368334986042 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.