In any field-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
In this day and age, it is debatable whether the most guaranteed way to engender success is revitalization through novel leadership in fields of business, politics, education, and government. It is an axiomatic argumement because of several reasons.
To begin with, sustenance of power among authorities especially in politics can yield detriments. People with wrong ideas and injustice throughts are apt to abuse their power over ordinary citizens, thus engendering societal harms. In case of a monarchy country located in the Middleeast, Qatar, discrimination against gender, class, and aliens are harsh; a lot of it has to do with the nation's monarchy system. Due to authority being overly assigned to a single individual for an extended period of time, protests and revolts in an attempt to solve social problems like discrimination are rarely taking place. Also, North Korea, with its protracted dictatorship, discrepancies between people with power and people without power are widening as time goes by, thereby making situations worse. Therefore, those nations are slowed in development, which prevents them from becoming developed countries.
Moreover, shift of power is needed on a regular basis in order to reduce iniquity in the field of education. Fairness is a quality especially crucial in education field since it is dealing with nurturing future pillars of a society. Scandals where teachers and even principals are bribed to manipulate and distort test results which affect students' transcripts and extracurricular are repeatedly happening. Such injustice tend to happen with consolidated authorities because it does not harm their career if a system of revitalization does not exist. If shift of power occurs frequently, teachers and principals would be more cautious of their behavior since evidence of abuse of power can seriously affect their future election. Transparency of careers of school faculties will create a brighter society with much hopes on the next generation.
Admittedly, there are some cases where a single power for a long time elicits successful outcomes. Gun Hee Lee, a CEO of a global company Samsung, who was in that position for over several decades, created and maintained the company's success and developed the company into becoming one of the most influential firms worldwide. It is evident that the company's success owes immensely to his not stepping down, because he is such a charismatic and visionary CEO who can adapt to changes of demands of customers over several decades. However, the problem is that there is no adequate successor, and such fact put the company into danger since Lee was a symbol of the company. Had he stepped down before, the company could have had more time to train candidates of successors and have less concerns for their future.
All in all, shifting power on a regular basis is one of the surest path to success in many fields including politics, education, business, and government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...e harsh; a lot of it has to do with the nations monarchy system. Due to authority being...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... to a single individual for an extended period of time, protests and revolts in an attempt to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 811, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ies will create a brighter society with much hopes on the next generation. Admit...
^^^^
Line 7, column 781, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun concerns is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...train candidates of successors and have less concerns for their future. All in a...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'as to', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282442748092 0.240241500013 118% => OK
Verbs: 0.141221374046 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0896946564885 0.0880659088768 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0477099236641 0.0497285424764 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.030534351145 0.0444667217837 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145038167939 0.12292977631 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0381679389313 0.0406280797675 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91901409961 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0267175572519 0.030933414821 86% => OK
Particles: 0.00190839694656 0.0016655270985 115% => OK
Determiners: 0.074427480916 0.0997080785238 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0114503816794 0.0249443105267 46% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114503816794 0.0148568991511 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2977.0 2732.02544248 109% => OK
No of words: 472.0 452.878318584 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.30720338983 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417372881356 0.366273622748 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.332627118644 0.280924506359 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.233050847458 0.200843997647 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152542372881 0.132149295362 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91901409961 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 219.290929204 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572033898305 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 70.9023735791 55.4138127331 128% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6 23.380412469 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4003537721 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.85 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 23.380412469 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.45 0.674092028746 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 56.8627118644 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 2.12173913043 1.64882698954 129% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252320334229 0.391690518653 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0812194815464 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0748956036102 0.077325440228 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.514255647055 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.181491799891 0.149214159877 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100063186676 0.161403998019 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859199428855 0.0892212321368 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.275132062163 0.385218514788 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0678187502959 0.0692045440612 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200330313112 0.275328986314 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752150860608 0.0653680567796 115% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.