In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The speaker claims that beginners in any field of inquiry are more likely to make crucial contributions to the investigation than an expert or veteran. This statement holds true in a majority of professions such as police work and detective work. There are plenty of examples where a neophyte gave important insights that ultimately helped in solving a case. However, the statement may tend to be overstated when it is taken as a given. The experts in a field have been deemed so because they acquired years of experience and demonstrated skills that have enabled them to climb the heirarchy in their respective professions. Thus, the statement needs a close examination to evaluate this school of thought.
Novices tend to not be blinded by tried and tested procedures and rules. They bring a fresh pair of eyes into the investigation and may uncover clues that may have missed the eyes of a veteran investigator. Unorthodox procedures employed by the freshers may be the thing that is needed in cracking cold cases that have been shelved due to a dead end in investigation. To illustrate this, consider the case of the infamous Zodiac killer. Recenlty , the cold case was reopened by a rookie detective who claimed he wishes to lend a new dimension to the investigation that failed to catch the serial killer. Although, the appeal to reopen the case is still pending, it is exciting to see what may be uncovered by a new set of eyes.
Furthermore, the beginners are fresh out of university and usually it is their first foray into the real world. They tend to uphold the values that the law and enforcement body is based on. Due to years of serving in the force, officers tend to forget that they serve the people. Their conscience seems to be marred by venality and heartlessness. However, here the rookies bring a sharp contrast with their willingness to go above and beyond to maintain the integrity and dignity of law. For example, there was a recent case where a corrupt police officer was called out by a rookie to correct his ways which made an emphatic statement concerning the priorities of the new crop.
Although, they are are certainly capable of making major contributions in any field of inquiry, a novice's path is usually filled with obstacles and hindrance at every level. High standing offcials often brush aside their opinions and tend to squelch them with their power. A recent example highlighting such a situation is the uproar in the Indian navy when a cadet was forced to the bidding of a higher official by performing house chores for him. Hence, ego and power often come in the way of actual progress that could be made in these fields.
In order to sum up, I would like to underscore the importance of supporting the beginners and rookies by encouraging them to present their views. The field of investigation is an unpredictable and meticulous field and any keen insights are usually welcomed. An important clue that may have been overlooked by a veteran may be spotted by a rookie and vice-versa. The end result, nonetheless, is helpful in cracking the case.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctive work. There are plenty of examples where a neophyte gave important insights...
^^
Line 1, column 709, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to evaluate this school of thought. Novices tend to not be blinded by tried ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of the infamous Zodiac killer. Recenlty , the cold case was reopened by a rookie ...
^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and enforcement body is based on. Due to years of serving in the force, officers ...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...ties of the new crop. Although, they are are certainly capable of making major contr...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss that could be made in these fields. In order to sum up, I would like to unde...
^^^^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld like to underscore the importance of supporting the beginners and rookies by ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'look', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'as for', 'for example', 'such as', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234887737478 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.188255613126 0.157235817809 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0742659758204 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0310880829016 0.0497285424764 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0379965457686 0.0444667217837 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110535405872 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0621761658031 0.0406280797675 153% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79683074217 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0431778929188 0.030933414821 140% => OK
Particles: 0.00345423143351 0.0016655270985 207% => OK
Determiners: 0.122625215889 0.0997080785238 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0155440414508 0.0249443105267 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0259067357513 0.0148568991511 174% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3110.0 2732.02544248 114% => OK
No of words: 534.0 452.878318584 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82397003745 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.331460674157 0.366273622748 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243445692884 0.280924506359 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176029962547 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114232209738 0.132149295362 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79683074217 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 219.290929204 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513108614232 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 62.1991240784 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5384615385 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8733386625 59.4972553346 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.576923076923 0.674092028746 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 44.8830308269 51.4728631049 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.58389261745 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491617856079 0.391690518653 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.072292068175 0.123202303941 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0631496823734 0.077325440228 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498337740206 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.104610177801 0.149214159877 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193329305376 0.161403998019 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920332730652 0.0892212321368 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.463091678069 0.385218514788 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0668220616694 0.0692045440612 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358932421953 0.275328986314 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368974452654 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.