The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
The most competent leaders are those which encourage and ask for feedback from those they are leading.
There are many different types of leaders and managers in the world. Some are very strict in what they let you do, whereas others prefer to give space and creative freedom to those they are managing. The success of differing methods depends not only on the situation but also the personality and work ethic of those being led. Therefore, to be a successful leader it is imperative that one listens to, and responds to, feedback. This allows the leader's mentality to adapt to different situations and personalities, which is of utmost importance if one is to succeed in leading. If the leader was to listen to feedback but not act, then the potential benefits are lost.
Encouraging feedback allows for the leader to understand and learn from those that they lead exactly what they are doing right and what they can improve upon. Without this insight, a leader would not know if they are pushing too hard or letting people get away with too much. Thus, by allowing this insight the leader can get the best out of everyone they are leading. However, this does require that the leader is not being misled through feedback from dissatisfied followers.
The encouragement of feedback also increases a sense of participation that each member of a group has within an organization, a team or a country. It evokes the feeling that they are making a difference and what they think matters. Such emotions can help morale in any situation and make people follow a specific leader passionately. Without this participation, followers can quickly become marginalized and no longer wish to be under the leader. Yet, this increased passion will only occur if the feedback that is given is listened to and acted upon. By listening to but seemingly ignoring the feedback this could be more detrimental than not listening to any feedback in the first place.
Nevertheless, feedback alone is not the making of the greatest leaders. The key to being a successful leader is complex and requires many traits and abilities that can not simply be gained by receiving feedback. A leader must be able to command a room with ease; they must be able to make hard decisions under time constraints; they must be able to to put the need of many over that of a few; and they must be able to work hard, for long hours, to lead by example and excel. These are but some of the traits required, some of which can be learned, but others are seen as a natural gift.
The best leaders are those that encourage feedback from those that follow them. Encouraging feedback allows for the leader to adapt to many situations, improve upon their leadership style and give a sense of participation to those that they are leading. However, encouraging feedback should not be taken as the only quality that makes the best leaders. There are many more traits required to be the best, which must be combined with the feedback to produce the best leaders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...om those they are leading. There are many different types of leaders and managers in the wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... responds to, feedback. This allows the leaders mentality to adapt to different situati...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 347, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...der time constraints; they must be able to to put the need of many over that of a few...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 490, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ead by example and excel. These are but some of the traits required, some of which can be l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, as to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2501.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80038387716 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59132152828 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437619961612 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2427521971 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.04 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.84 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399048771096 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132156900746 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113285314765 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266619746337 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117313183948 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.