The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
For many decades leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Winston Churchill, Steve Jobs has tranformed the society culturally, politically and technologically. They brought in positive changes in the society which no on had thought before or seems impossible for a common people.All great and innovative leaders have one traits in common i.e. not being obdurate and they always try to get feedback from the people whom they lead and may change their belief according to the wishes of their followers.
Great leaders has the ability to sense the need of common people and they mold themselves according to the wishes of their followers. For example, When Gandhi returned from South Africa he was wearing british cloths but he tranformed in to a monk by wearing cotton cloths when he got feedback that he has to be among common people in order to understand them.
The leaders who does not listen to feedback of their followers and is dogmatic or obdurate, their society or country will always be in turmoil. Tehy may get successs initially but in the long run they fail their society or country. Consider for example HItler, He was the epitome of Obduracy. He was not listening to any of his general's advice during world war 2 and has taken full charges on his own. He got success initially by gaining ascendency over many countries for eg. France, and Austria. But he lost to combined power of Russia and USA without the General's help.
However, It is not incumbent on leaders to always mold to their follower's feedback. It might be possible that their followers are wrong. if the leader is confident that his decision helps the society and country, he should stick to his cause even though their followers may think otherwise. Consider for example Winston Churchill did not agreed to terms and condition of Hitler for war peace and many general in Britain were not happy with Churchill's obduracy. He followed his instincts and the results were in his favour.
In conclusion, Many leaders has got success by listening to the feedback of their followers but he should not always act according to the feedback of their followers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...n positive changes in the society which no on had thought before or seems impossib...
^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: All
...or seems impossible for a common people.All great and innovative leaders have one t...
^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one trait', 'a trait', or simply 'traits'?
Suggestion: one trait; a trait; traits
...e.All great and innovative leaders have one traits in common i.e. not being obdurate and t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ossible that their followers are wrong. if the leader is confident that his decisi...
^^
Line 8, column 339, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'agree'
Suggestion: agree
...r for example Winston Churchill did not agreed to terms and condition of Hitler for wa...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 349, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'term'.
Suggestion: term
...ple Winston Churchill did not agreed to terms and condition of Hitler for war peace a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92222222222 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55147016443 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497222222222 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6832758755 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.235294118 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178208944099 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543902139022 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679824128529 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115935947175 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614762713423 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.