The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The youth are the future of a nation. It is the first and foremost duty of a nation to build up the mind and character of the young generation with social ethics, moral values and in a scrupulous way. It is the cardinal responsibility of the parents and the teachers to develop the character and mind of the young generation with proper and accurate manner. However, if the nation failed to develop the character of the young generation in a scrupulous manner than it will create lots of deleterious effects on the success and prosperity of the nation.
The above issues it tried to underscore the factor that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. This thought is completely wrong and it will create huge pernicious impact on the growth and success of the society and the whole nation. It is our paramount duty to admonish the people if they are doing any kind of harmful actions that restrained the success of the society. If we cannot take necessary steps when anything wrong is happening than in near future it will create a huge conundrum which will become totally unsolvable by any means. As well as it is also our prime duty to praise someone when they are doing some good things. This types of praise will captivate them and encourage them to do something more enthralling in future for the betterment of the country and the whole nation.
An example is used to delineate the above circumstance. The young generation is the most important asset of the society. They are very enthusiastic and adventurous and also like to do new and intriguing things everyday. From their passion if they started to take pernicious drugs like marijuana, yeeba, and many other harmful drugs it is our cardinal duty to strongly admonish them or if needed we can even give them extremely painful punishment so that they can realize their fault and stop to taking these harmful drugs. On the other hand, if we never admonish them for their critical behaviour they will never able to realize their fault and thus it might be possible they will ruin their life as well as the growth rate of the whole nation.
Another example is used to undergrid the above issue. Like environmental pollution is a grab bag now a day and the scientists and researchers are trying hard to solve or even reduce the effect of the environmental pollution. The harmful chemical that is used by the chemical and textile factories like poly pyrrole, methyl orange, blue vitriol etc are one of the main culprit of this pollution. Consequently, it is the major duty of the government to stop the use of these harmful chemicals and should take necessary steps to stop the use of these chemicals. Eventually, if they do not take necessary actions than they will continue to use these harmful chemicals and it will hamper the ozone layer by creating ozone holes and increase the rate of environmental pollution.
In conclusion, it should be highly underscore that we should not ignore the negative doing of any people because if we do so it will create major impact on the success of the nation. However, more importantly, we should also praise people or sometimes award them for their positive activities and it will encourage them and make them more enthusiastic for doing better work in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
The youth are the future of a nation. It is the first...
^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a scrupulous way" with adverb for "scrupulous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...on with social ethics, moral values and in a scrupulous way. It is the cardinal responsibility of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a scrupulous manner" with adverb for "scrupulous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...p the character of the young generation in a scrupulous manner than it will create lots of deleterious...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... restrained the success of the society. If we cannot take necessary steps when any...
^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...so like to do new and intriguing things everyday. From their passion if they started to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, so, thus, well, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2728.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75261324042 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6045220421 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.40243902439 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 878.4 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1168586797 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988959125393 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330622997381 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582430250682 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580395149519 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410411966957 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.