The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Various teaching methods are available and utilised for teaching. it is not possible to select one method as the best method, as they all have their merits and demerits and should be used after considering several parameters such as action, context, age, and the environment.
Praising positive deeds as stated in the statement may not always result in proper learning. As an example, students doing their homework should not be complimented. They can infer that their assignments and chores are complementary tasks that they should be praised for upon accomplishment and it is all right to ignore them since no punishment awaits them as stated in the statement. On the other hand, praising hardworking students for their performance can motivate others to perform better so the context is important when evaluating a teaching method.
In addition, ignoring negative actions may result in negative effects. To illustrate, children do not understand wrongdoing without being told so it is necessary that negative actions and behaviours are denoted and people committing them are punished accordingly both the person committing the action and other observers will learn from the experience. Punishment commensurate with negative actions can preclude the recurrence of such actions.
Teaching methods should be selected based on various parameter some of which were introduced. There is no best teaching method and in many cases, a combination of different teaching methods is utilised.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...re available and utilised for teaching. it is not possible to select one method as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, may, so, in addition, such as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 58.6224719101 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 230.0 442.535393258 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4652173913 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91521333852 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595652173913 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.443107576 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.272727273 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141554345165 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611562878827 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305248355268 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835947660496 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190404150602 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.