Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
great leadership is always the prime cause for the development of the nation. In past, various change of leadership, from tyrannical to democratic, has been experienced. changing time demand new leadership to be stable. however, the frequent change of the leadership may not be wise for the search of the development. The claim of the new leadership is very complex matter and always demanding new is kind of the illogical. The major two reasons that dispute the claim that surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
To begin, what if the current leadership is impeccable for serving the country in better way while the new leadership is very naïve in the field. if the condition of the great leadership is very insightful and the irreplaceable in the matter of the vision, plan and the execution of the plan, it becomes audacity to forgo these kind of leadership. Again, on the other hand uncertainty of the success of the new leadership cannot be ignored and better o lie in the surety of the success. In instance, the reign of the former president “Barack Obama” of the usa assumes very successful and considered very perspicacious person. if he had been replaced with another candidate, it would have been different scenario either bad or good, but both lies in the uncertainty. he did not get abdicated immediately after five years so he was able to practice what he want and see which is better for the people of the usa. it should better to consider the quality of the leadership before throw out in the hope of getting better leadership.
Secondly, if the current leadership has long term fruitful plant, it is better to allow them to continue without demanding new leadership. In instance, the Barack Obama has long term vision regarding aim of uplifting the economy of the caused by crisis due to the real state. The long term plan has become very effective to uplift the economy of the united states. Suppose, what would be the economy of the usa if he has been obstructed in the middle of the plan for the sake of the new leadership. Thus, it is not always right the right things.
In conclusion. We cannot deny that the new leadership has done the revolution in the world. however, the ability of the leader must matter to carry the county on his shoulder and for the better future of the country’s public so to demand change for the new leadership on the existence of the leader of great astuteness, that would be abstruse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Great
great leadership is always the prime cause fo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...ause for the development of the nation. In past, various change of leadership, from tyr...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Changing
...al to democratic, has been experienced. changing time demand new leadership to be stable...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ime demand new leadership to be stable. however, the frequent change of the leadership ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... leadership is very naïve in the field. if the condition of the great leadership i...
^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... the plan, it becomes audacity to forgo these kind of leadership. Again, on the other hand...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 637, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...d considered very perspicacious person. if he had been replaced with another candi...
^^
Line 2, column 777, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...good, but both lies in the uncertainty. he did not get abdicated immediately after...
^^
Line 2, column 866, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...ears so he was able to practice what he want and see which is better for the people ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 922, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ch is better for the people of the usa. it should better to consider the quality o...
^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...dly, if the current leadership has long term fruitful plant, it is better to allow t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
... In instance, the Barack Obama has long term vision regarding aim of uplifting the e...
^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding aim of uplifting the economy of the caused by crisis due to the real state. ...
^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...p has done the revolution in the world. however, the ability of the leader must matter ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at astuteness, that would be abstruse.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78007620959 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460648148148 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7872244262 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.947368421 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213099293082 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063380221277 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721977107088 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133457254544 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767818263381 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.