Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
With the world changing every day and the requirements evolving on daily basis, the need for our leaders to see the problem from different perspectives everyday has become paramount. Therefore, the leaders, in any field – business, education, government, should step down after five years.
In business, with requirements of the customer evolving everyday based on the trends, it has become important that the leaders contemplate the customer problems from different angles so as to adhere to trend. With the same leader leading a company from always, sometimes they become blind folded to seeing the problem from other perspectives. With new leader, it is possible to have new perspective, even the better ones, can lead to new innovation in the company, and hence success. Same is true with other fields too – politics, education, government.
In India, we saw a huge change after Prime minister Narendra Modi came to power. One of the changes was Demonetization. This had put lots of people with black money in trouble, hence uncovering their crimes. His way was different and produced significant results. Same is true for education. We can see that with new leaders, the way of teaching is changing very fast and for the good of the students. Before, students had to mug up the lessons in their courses, irrespective of their interests to pass their semester. Now, the trend is changing to make it more student friendly so that they can focus only on the subjects that interest them.
Although it is true that new way of thinking can bring innovation, it is possible that those innovations are not worthy and not in adherence to solving the actual problem. This totally depends on the new leader in power. Also, as we know change is uncomfortable, people might not like the changes which the new leader brings in. But, until there is a change, we will never know if it did good or bad to the society. Sticking to the same pattern is no solution to the changing trend. Therefore, a calculated decision to put a new leader to power can be more fruitful than futile.
We, thus, saw that in order to bring innovation and different perspectives, it is important that those in power should step down in five years in order to bring success to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...the problem from different perspectives everyday has become paramount. Therefore, the le...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...h requirements of the customer evolving everyday based on the trends, it has become impo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...customer problems from different angles so as to adhere to trend. With the same leader l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...tive, even the better ones, can lead to new innovation in the company, and hence success. Same...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly on the subjects that interest them. Although it is true that new way of thin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87338501292 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69337425942 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509043927649 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7886366458 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8095238095 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166668059569 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551009912101 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819922990045 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111558576645 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615843919991 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.