Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
While if authority of any field like business, politics, education, government changes for every five years, it helps integration of newer ideas with existing policies to exhort the development in these fields. The thought of availability of limited time to prove themselves also makes the leadership of these fields to use their full potential, work effectively and interestingly. Like a change always reminds everyone that nothing is permanent. Its human tendency to be careless in their obligations if they know that nothing can dethrone them. But, saying the surest way to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership may not hold true always because we can ensure the performance of the new leadership.
Firstly, in any field no authority is perfect and ideal, there are drawbacks associated with each authority. Like to exemplify, the government of India changes for every five years from its independence, there are loopholes associated with each government as any government cannot address all the problems of its people. For example Congress ruled India starting from 2004 for a period of ten years. In era of congress reports say that the economic security, food security was increased. But, in second tenure of Congress depreciation of value of rupee and many scams like Coal scam, 2G spectrum scam took place in India which ultimately lead to dethronement of Congress in 2014 elections in India. Even BJP which came to power in Indian in 2014, though implemented various powerful schemes like Swaach Bharat, it is known for believing only in Hinduism. But, a government of any country shouldn’t indulge to biased religious matters. So, it is obvious that in order to overcome the losses incurred during the span of particular authority, there is a need of change of power.
Secondly, it’s human tendency to become careless towards their obligations, if they do same job continuously it doesn’t really fascinate them. Any field can see phase of effective progress with novel, innovative ideas, perseverance and hard work. The new enthusiastic leadership often increase glory of their enterprise by employing intensive, appropriate methods. For example, Google has been in phase of tremendous success since Sunder Pichai was made as its CEO. Sunder Pichai played important role in developing the web browser product which evolved into Google Chrome now, he also enhanced the development of Google maps, Google Drive, Gmail, Android etc. These apps are used by almost every person world-wide on day to day basis. These software products are used by students, business men, employees, even farmers these days to aid them in their work.
Thirdly, having said above, the success of any enterprise cannot be sure because of only newer leadership since we cannot deny the value of experience gained by existing leadership. Despite of innovative methods implemented by newer leadership, their lack of experience can bring disgrace to their enterprise in any field. So, in my opinion the newer leadership can become more robust and effective if some guidance is offered to it from previous leadership.
To conclude, the process of changing authority for very five years can gives a chance to people who wants to contribute for development and to prove themselves. It also helps in implementing innovative, modern, appropriate methods. But, to ensure success of any enterprise the selection of newer leadership is very crucial. The selection of newer leadership should be based on elections so that opinions of everyone is accounted like in formation of newer governments of any country. In any field, this process also helps the existing authority to continue their service if everyone is satisfied with them.
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree to the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 66
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 83
- claim: The best part of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing opinion.Reason: Only by being forced to defend against the doubts and contrasting vies of others does one can really discover the value of that idea.Write a response i 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ice if everyone is satisfied with them.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 103.0 58.6224719101 176% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3163.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 597.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29815745394 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8733594325 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 311.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520938023451 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 1003.5 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7192489258 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.964285714 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3214285714 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32142857143 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265289340577 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680246176797 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647715963067 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154100208127 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058093769303 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.