Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible
While often we see that the main motive of any corporation is to make maximum profits by adopting methods which satisfy the constraints made by law, in a border sense if the corporate even takes responsibility of promoting well-being of societies and environments, it can indirectly contribute to increase in its profits. We can say this by analysing the advantages of corporate social responsibility.
Firstly, if a corporate takes initiatives which serve societies, through such methods it can advertise its products to wider range of people effectively. For example, Lenskart has started an initiative of free eye check-up in many colleges. It’s obvious that students who cannot afford consultancy fees and new spectacles tend to utilize such services. Many students who didn’t know this brand before become aware of this brand. If the students like their service, Lenskart would increase its profits by large amounts. Thus such process helps to serve people and also corporates can invest their funds in effective advertisements rather than wasting their money in traditional advertisements.
Secondly, by adopting to these service oriented methods, corporates can gain consumer trust and good reputation. By gaining consumer trust, they can increase their sales hugely. To exemplify its human nature to buy things only after we believe that the product is efficacious. Beauty products, fruits, electronic goods, bags or anything for that matter, we only buy if we have some trust on the brand. Hence to increase their profits, it is advantageous for the corporates to indulge in corporate social responsibility.
Thirdly, by promoting environment friendly process may be in their production process, corporates can enhance the health of their employees and societies. By just adopting laws they may not create positive vibes in their work culture. If their employees and societies are overwhelmed with the works of corporates, they can buy more products of these corporates. Like instead of spending money on health issues, they can spend it by consuming products of the corporates.
Hence I believe, by promoting social and environmental activities corporates not only help societies, in an indirect way it also benefits them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... increase its profits by large amounts. Thus such process helps to serve people and ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 703, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir money in traditional advertisements. Secondly, by adopting to these service o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...buy if we have some trust on the brand. Hence to increase their profits, it is advant...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...consuming products of the corporates. Hence I believe, by promoting social and envi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an indirect way" with adverb for "indirect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ies corporates not only help societies, in an indirect way it also benefits them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46264367816 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02740352175 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566091954023 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.1675458773 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.611111111 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197754581767 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561682300191 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464486197159 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107051399526 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471758738624 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.