Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The success of any enterprise is heavily dependent on the vision of its leader. Changing the leader from time to time is of paramount importance for progress. Keeping provision for changing leadership allows to monitor the progress made by the leadership, brings in new ideas to tackle existing problem, is 100% performance based, therefore, those in puissance should step down after five years for the prosperity of an organization.
First, vicissitude of leadership with time equips those being led to track the progress. For instance, in politics, it is essential that those in power should step down after five years. If those in power have significantly contributed to the advancement of the nation. They will be further put into power after the election with approval from people. In case, where the government just has squandered the money, they will not come to power again and therefore the provision of changing leadership allows the government to be revitalized.
Next, new people bring novel ideas that may contribute to radical positive change. For example, appointing new CEO after every five years means the company is likely to make progress. This may not be true all the time, but it will certainly help to bring a progressive change.
If those in power do not have the fear of being changed, the company or government is more likely to be in a stasis.
Let us consider the case of government. If those in power are not changes every five, the government would soon become dictatorial and this will brings the nation down instead of ascendancy to a more prosperous country.
Overall, those in power should step down every five years because new people bring in new ideas that may cause radical change, allows to monitor progress, and prevent dictatorship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'monitoring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: monitoring
...rovision for changing leadership allows to monitor the progress made by the leadership, br...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ower should step down after five years. If those in power have significantly contr...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...d soon become dictatorial and this will brings the nation down instead of ascendancy t...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 135, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'monitoring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: monitoring
...s that may cause radical change, allows to monitor progress, and prevent dictatorship.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 295.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03389830508 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7159206952 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9766808907 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267796590369 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964139385106 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874329026289 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138017854814 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063145343059 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.