Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Growing up an organization is not an easy task nowadays as everything has changed quite fast, especially those who relate to technology. Therefore, the leaders’ roles become crucial than ever. Their working principle and decisions make huge effects on the survival of organizations. That poses an important question about how we could recruit great leaders. One thinks that changing leaders after every five years will make sure revitalizing for organizations. However, I can only agree with this claim to an extent due to disparity characteristics of organizations.
Admittedly, new leadership will bring a new wind to an organization as different people have different ways to thinking and running. And it really decides the success or failure of a company. Take for instance, after Steve Job left Apple, the company went down dramatically. Nonetheless, when he again took over, this was the best innovative time for Apple.
Nonetheless, changing leadership in all organization in every five does not mean it will carry the same outcome. I think the fact lie on the characteristics and the period of organization for example in education. If a state desires to expand its public education by implementing a new state university, they would need a solid leader for the first period, and it is an easy question to answer about how long it takes the principle to settle down the new university. In this case, how to settle down the university should be more concerned than how to implement the 5-year-cycle.
Similar to the government, there are reasons why US presidents have usually gone for 2 terms which are 8 years instead of just 4 or 5. The first four just suffices to get to know the environment and the practices of the government, the later 4 years is the real-time to fully implement his strategies.
In sum, perhaps the argument should be changed as depending on the characteristics and periods of an organization that five-year-cycles should be implemented to maximize revitalization through leadership.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17021276596 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23327115603 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.458171485 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.058823529 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153609953854 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458721039438 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359541534273 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860352326306 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294074454954 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.