Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.
Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
The issue of whether young people should follow their dreams or pick worthy goals is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that young people should follow their dreams. This way, they are unfettered to choose the career they like the most.
Reasonable people may contend that many people's dreams are inherently selfish. For example, people may want to earn more money and become rich, without regard to social ethics. However, telling them to pick reasonable goals and not follow their dreams is not a solution to the problem. Children must be taught values and ethics, and should be allowed to choose the path they like the most.
Moreover, young people who follow their dreams have better chances of succeeding in what they do, than people who have been told to pick worthy goals. Inasmuch as people who follow their dreams feel contented and happy when they achieve their goals, they should not be told what goal they should choose. If young people are told what to do with their lives, they will feel manacled. Instead, they should be given freedom to choose what they want to do in the future.
Young minds are filled with hope and creativity. They are pristine and clear. They may dream about things which sound quixotic to many. But, this does not mean that they are incapable of achieving their dreams. Their artistic skills and creativity should not be curbed. They should be given a chance to prove themselves.
To sum up, even though young people are fledglings and naive, they should be given an opportunity to prove themselves. Instead of emphasising on picking worthy goals, they should be allowed to be what they want.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'for example', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.168224299065 0.240241500013 70% => OK
Verbs: 0.224299065421 0.157235817809 143% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0872274143302 0.0880659088768 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0404984423676 0.0497285424764 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0965732087227 0.0444667217837 217% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0654205607477 0.12292977631 53% => OK
Participles: 0.0560747663551 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.19909490586 2.79330140395 79% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0467289719626 0.030933414821 151% => OK
Particles: 0.00311526479751 0.0016655270985 187% => OK
Determiners: 0.0436137071651 0.0997080785238 44% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0467289719626 0.0249443105267 187% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0311526479751 0.0148568991511 210% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1683.0 2732.02544248 62% => OK
No of words: 287.0 452.878318584 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86411149826 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362369337979 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.177700348432 0.280924506359 63% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.108013937282 0.200843997647 54% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0696864111498 0.132149295362 53% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19909490586 2.79330140395 79% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 219.290929204 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501742160279 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 49.2177176284 55.4138127331 89% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.1052631579 23.380412469 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8755370385 59.4972553346 54% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5789473684 141.124799967 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1052631579 23.380412469 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.473684210526 0.674092028746 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 32.8752980011 51.4728631049 64% => OK
Elegance: 0.801724137931 1.64882698954 49% => Essaays need to be developed more elegantly.
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316903484768 0.391690518653 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134453484012 0.123202303941 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.115894088045 0.077325440228 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.537401630232 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12670311943 0.149214159877 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129258868446 0.161403998019 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531439864055 0.0892212321368 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356137630017 0.385218514788 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0322526153819 0.0692045440612 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222309911515 0.275328986314 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046944821699 0.0653680567796 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.