Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The given argument contends that the existing legal system of our society is inadequate in solving the problems of our modern society and has provided a logical reasoning to support its claim. My views are in agreement with the claim established by the author. I do agree that the existing law system is still imperfect and, even after all these years of development, still requires improvement in its judging system.
Laws are developed to solve the problem of our society. There are many rubrics set forward in the constitution abiding by which the legal body yearns to solve the societal problem. This complicated rubric is itself a loophole in its establishment. Presence of so many procedures and exceptions for each of them makes it possible for criminals to find a way to escape the hands of the law. At the same time, it also makes it extremely difficult for a peasant to follow up to whatever procedures set forward by the statutory body to get his justice. Hence, his trust in the procedures vitiates away.
The expensive nature of the law system is also daunting for any middle-class person and so such people would be reluctant to approach the court. There have been many cases where an appellant has lost more money than how much he has gained by winning the lawsuit. Seeing this, not many people approach any court even though injustice has bruised them.
Laws are created to guide the society to do the right thing by impacting their minds and hearts positively. But this is not always the case. Many times people become reluctant to follow the law. They disparage the rules that have been set forward by the government even though it is for their own sake. The rules, such as paying fine when one breaks the traffic rules, are often derided.
Rules written in the law book is written in favour of the majority group of the public, by the majority party. So, the minorities are often left out. For example: In a country populated by mostly Hindus, the law may be to give public holiday during Dashain - Hindus' festival, but not in Christmas - Christain's festival, or even in Eid - Islam's festival. It is itself a form of discrimination then.
Putting things in a nutshell, laws are definitely the best guide that a society has right now, but it is imperfect and still needs improvement if it is to be able to address all the issues of the society correctly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, still, then, after all, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74698795181 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56266441781 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53734939759 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.6914970876 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5454545455 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8636363636 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234547866383 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593532592768 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058993328075 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108376042163 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501908911564 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.