Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The given opinion is presenting the controversial issue of whether the laws and regulations can change all problems present in the modern society. In a modern society, there are several problems, some could be solved through rules and regulations of government some can not. Indisputably, government rules are pretty effective in dealing with the sever issues like traffic rules, thefts, Murder etc. Nevertheless there are some problems which can not change through these rules. Rules are laws are generally have tangible effects like if you break the traffic rules you will be fined or if you murder someone then you would be punished and sent to jail. In this way, rule can not constrained the behaviour of human mind, they can not circumscribe your thoughts whether your thoughts are good or bad, they can preclude your actions if they are falling under govt's jurisdiction.
firsly, if we talk about the use of modern technology like mobile, computer etc. In the modern city the main problem among kids and youths even in mature one is that they are investing so much time in their mobile phones, chatting apps, video games, movies. These are ofcourse not severe society problems, but if we than from the broad prospective then we would realise that in which direction our modern society is heading. Instead playing outside physical game like football, cricket, etc., kids are more inclining towards online video games. I do not think these games are improving their intellectual skills but certainly, these games are not imroving their physical growth and behavioral growth. No rules present can inhibit these youth and kids from playing these online games.
Secondly, the issue of combine family and behaviour issue among family members. In old days, parents used to live with their children, their grand children but in now days they have to live separate from their children in the old age house. Rules and regulation can not change the mind and behaviour of these children and can teach them the moral values of combine family. People are running for money, leisure life and physical pleasures and forgetting their ethical and moral values. They are not respecting their parents, their teachers, even their soul mates. No law could ever be effective to teach them these issues.
There are other problems of religious transformation. There are some organization spread in all over world who are pursuading poor people, credulous people and persuading them to change their religion. Although, religion practics are fundamental right but to follow a particular religion in the effluence of others is not justified.
Admittedly, through some ethical rules, moral rules, society behavior for these issues could be changed. As if a country mendate among their citizens than no parents would live along apart from childern and childern have to provide home and money to their parents then, the old age orphanage problem could be mitiage at some extent. Similary, if a counrty necessiate that children below certain age could not be given mobile phones, then intial behavior of children would inclined towards physical activity and this mobile issues could be solved at some extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt rules are pretty effective in dealing with the sever issues like traffic rules...
^^
Line 1, column 510, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ese rules. Rules are laws are generally have tangible effects like if you break the ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 682, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'constrain'
Suggestion: constrain
...sent to jail. In this way, rule can not constrained the behaviour of human mind, they can n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firsly
...e falling under govts jurisdiction. firsly, if we talk about the use of modern tec...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng kids and youths even in mature one is that they are investing so much time in ...
^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...irection our modern society is heading. Instead playing outside physical game like foot...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this youth' or 'these youths'?
Suggestion: this youth; these youths
...al growth. No rules present can inhibit these youth and kids from playing these online game...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e organization spread in all over world who are pursuading poor people, credulous peopl...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 473, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'incline'
Suggestion: incline
... then intial behavior of children would inclined towards physical activity and this mobi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2684.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17148362235 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46706996061 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481695568401 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 825.3 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0491251727 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54166666667 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128917471828 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402789517844 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439821519212 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683906705651 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421887028886 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.